At 11:06 AM 5/22/96 -0500, you wrote:
>An excellent and rather short statement on the matter appears in Charles
>Guignon's "Introduction," to _The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger_. While
>I am not yet sure how far Guignon goes in saving Heidegger's philosophy
>from his politics, his moderate and balanced approach at least provides a
>way to integrate the two without having them self-destruct.
A.F. Beavers, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof. Philosophy & Religion
> U of Evansville, Evansville, IN 47722 812-479-2682
> Metaphysics, Contemporary Continental Philosophy
>
Yes, this is quite good. For what I consider the best discussion of
Heidegger and this issue is Hans Sluga's -Heidegger's Crisis-.
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>An excellent and rather short statement on the matter appears in Charles
>Guignon's "Introduction," to _The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger_. While
>I am not yet sure how far Guignon goes in saving Heidegger's philosophy
>from his politics, his moderate and balanced approach at least provides a
>way to integrate the two without having them self-destruct.
A.F. Beavers, Ph.D. Assoc. Prof. Philosophy & Religion
> U of Evansville, Evansville, IN 47722 812-479-2682
> Metaphysics, Contemporary Continental Philosophy
>
Yes, this is quite good. For what I consider the best discussion of
Heidegger and this issue is Hans Sluga's -Heidegger's Crisis-.
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---