Jeff:
Are you inciting harrassment of Professor Larry Stepelevich? His comments
are always extremely intelligent and amusing. So he overlooked the Heidegger
list serve? Big deal - major oversight, Mon Dieu! He retracted his
oversight more than a week ago! Otherwise I happen to believe he is right
about Heidegger's attitude. Prof. Stepelevich's point is that Heidegger was
very ambivalent about technological progress. Who knows what Heidegger would
have thought as far as this little coterie of ours. But that is not the
point, mon petite monsieur! The point is you lack internet manners.
Listen: if anybody needs to have his derriere torched its you! I would hope
you would have enough sense left to apologize for your petty instigation.
It is you who must do all the retracting. Because chap you are in very very
poor form!
Cheerios
From: TAYLORJB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>A few days ago I received in the mail the latest issue of _The Owl of
>Minerva_, the journal of the Hegel Society of America. The issue began
>with a few words from the editor, Prof. Lawrence Stepelevich, about the
>Hegel mailing list, how good it is to have such a thing, how Hegel would
>have approved of this use of technology, etc. But there was also the
>following paragraph:
>
>"Yet I have not been able to find any circles of Heideggerians among the
>philosophical groups in the various 'Internet Directories.' That there
>would be no Heidegger discussion might be expected, since Heidegger
>harbored a great distrust of 'unifying the world', as it threatened
>the loss of 'locality'. Given these doubts, the development of a global
>communications network, a technological Unverborgenheit, could only
>but further weaken the already thin contact with Being. Be this as it
>may, I have not been able to find out if there was a telephone in
>der Hutte. I suspect not."
>
>I would like to suggest that we all write to Prof. Stepelevich and inform
>him of his error, and demand a correction be printed in the next issue,
>lest this disinformation be any more widely disseminated or accepted as
>true.
>Jeff
>
>Prof. Stepelevich's address:
>stepelevi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>or
>stepelevi@vuvaxcom
>
>The Hegel List is at
>hegel-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>(although I don't think you can post to it unless you are subscribed)
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Antoinette R. Wendel
Robert A. Wendel rwendel@xxxxxx
http://ic.net:80/~rwendel/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------
"But we do not yet hear, we whose hearing and seeing are perishing through
radio and film under the rule of technology."
"Yhe Turning"
Martin Heidegger
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
Are you inciting harrassment of Professor Larry Stepelevich? His comments
are always extremely intelligent and amusing. So he overlooked the Heidegger
list serve? Big deal - major oversight, Mon Dieu! He retracted his
oversight more than a week ago! Otherwise I happen to believe he is right
about Heidegger's attitude. Prof. Stepelevich's point is that Heidegger was
very ambivalent about technological progress. Who knows what Heidegger would
have thought as far as this little coterie of ours. But that is not the
point, mon petite monsieur! The point is you lack internet manners.
Listen: if anybody needs to have his derriere torched its you! I would hope
you would have enough sense left to apologize for your petty instigation.
It is you who must do all the retracting. Because chap you are in very very
poor form!
Cheerios
From: TAYLORJB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>A few days ago I received in the mail the latest issue of _The Owl of
>Minerva_, the journal of the Hegel Society of America. The issue began
>with a few words from the editor, Prof. Lawrence Stepelevich, about the
>Hegel mailing list, how good it is to have such a thing, how Hegel would
>have approved of this use of technology, etc. But there was also the
>following paragraph:
>
>"Yet I have not been able to find any circles of Heideggerians among the
>philosophical groups in the various 'Internet Directories.' That there
>would be no Heidegger discussion might be expected, since Heidegger
>harbored a great distrust of 'unifying the world', as it threatened
>the loss of 'locality'. Given these doubts, the development of a global
>communications network, a technological Unverborgenheit, could only
>but further weaken the already thin contact with Being. Be this as it
>may, I have not been able to find out if there was a telephone in
>der Hutte. I suspect not."
>
>I would like to suggest that we all write to Prof. Stepelevich and inform
>him of his error, and demand a correction be printed in the next issue,
>lest this disinformation be any more widely disseminated or accepted as
>true.
>Jeff
>
>Prof. Stepelevich's address:
>stepelevi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>or
>stepelevi@vuvaxcom
>
>The Hegel List is at
>hegel-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>(although I don't think you can post to it unless you are subscribed)
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Antoinette R. Wendel
Robert A. Wendel rwendel@xxxxxx
http://ic.net:80/~rwendel/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------
"But we do not yet hear, we whose hearing and seeing are perishing through
radio and film under the rule of technology."
"Yhe Turning"
Martin Heidegger
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------