Could Chris Dacus (and/or anyone else) explain the sense in which it
is said that ideology entails "some sort of error or transcendence"?
Is that true of the Althusserian notion of ideology -- as when a
"Marxist ideology" (one informed by science, I gather) is invoked?
I think D&G's "mots d'ordre" might come close to Zizek's "lived
ideology" (as cited by Jon).
Gene
------------------