> Garry, Zaha's work attempts to vitalize a sense of immobility in stasis
> architecture. In your view it seems that anyone who attempts to question
> or manipulate cartesian architecture somehow alienates those that do not
> have. If Zaha's work is about EVENT or the temporalization of the subject
> as opposed to IDENTITY in and object, how can her swerve away from
> normativity not be an attempt to generate an architecture of
> immateriality: that anyone could RELATE to?
I've seen the drawings and I've seen photos, but I've never seen the real
thing. Does her attempt work?
Photographs make it appear that the drawings are much more successful than
the built work.
Who's been there?
> architecture. In your view it seems that anyone who attempts to question
> or manipulate cartesian architecture somehow alienates those that do not
> have. If Zaha's work is about EVENT or the temporalization of the subject
> as opposed to IDENTITY in and object, how can her swerve away from
> normativity not be an attempt to generate an architecture of
> immateriality: that anyone could RELATE to?
I've seen the drawings and I've seen photos, but I've never seen the real
thing. Does her attempt work?
Photographs make it appear that the drawings are much more successful than
the built work.
Who's been there?