CPeebles@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> On 12.26. Hopkins wrote:
> ">
> And if it is religion, how does Heidegger define responsibility to the
> Other.[snip]
>
> This seems to me to be a very difficult question for it is not at all clear
> whether Heidegger speaks anywhere of responsibility.[snip]
H certainly does - everywhere one finds 'Gueltig' (sorry no umlaut
available right now), one should substitute responsibility. It is
an unfortunate thing that MacQuarrie chose to use 'Sin' instead.
Micheal vanPelt.
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
> On 12.26. Hopkins wrote:
> ">
> And if it is religion, how does Heidegger define responsibility to the
> Other.[snip]
>
> This seems to me to be a very difficult question for it is not at all clear
> whether Heidegger speaks anywhere of responsibility.[snip]
H certainly does - everywhere one finds 'Gueltig' (sorry no umlaut
available right now), one should substitute responsibility. It is
an unfortunate thing that MacQuarrie chose to use 'Sin' instead.
Micheal vanPelt.
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---