>To Colin Clayton; I do not claim to "be" anybody. I simply
>make comments now again in response to posts. This is ostensibly
>the point of the thing... The rather universally negative tone
>of replies to my posts doesn't disturb me because all this
>is vaporous stuff, of no consequence, aetherial murmurings.
>
>But I read what people write. When what is written strikes me
>as thoughtful and or insightful, I say so. When not, I say so.
>In our male dominated society I am approrpiating a shooting from
>the hip style not allowed women. Thus good old Michael Harrawood,
>who seems none to fond of the ladies in the first place, prefaced
>one of his earlier nasty cracks of the "how dare she variety"
>with a term of endearment usually reserved for friends, into
>which category he and I assuredly do not fall, if I can judge
>from the tenor of his spleen.
>
>In general, I have always found it to be a better course to begin
>by seeking to understand what could count as 'good' reasons why
>Heidegger settled on the instances he *did* choose as disclosive
>than to propose, as has been done more than once before on this list
>by the by, say, love (and Tom, if you are watching, all references
>to your name were fortuitous. I've nothing against you or your
>name, I liked some of the directions you seem to be moving in, just
>thought you could find much more inspiration in other fields
>than Heidegger's own) or "making Mommy proud" (credit: T. Blancato).
>
>But this is just my idea of rigor. It is, more than manifestly,
>a minority viewpoint. And, Dr. Clayton, since you mention books
>you've published on Heidegger, be aware that as yet I've done no
>such thing. I am a Nietzsche scholar, and I daresay even British
>libraries carry my book. Be my guest: look it up.
>
>I'll do the same, but your post hardly encourages me.
>
>See how mutual all this is?? Gives a new meaning to Heraclitus.
>
>Dr. B.E. Babich
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
I'm not a philosophy professor. And I say: go on Babette!
Antonio Tombolini
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>make comments now again in response to posts. This is ostensibly
>the point of the thing... The rather universally negative tone
>of replies to my posts doesn't disturb me because all this
>is vaporous stuff, of no consequence, aetherial murmurings.
>
>But I read what people write. When what is written strikes me
>as thoughtful and or insightful, I say so. When not, I say so.
>In our male dominated society I am approrpiating a shooting from
>the hip style not allowed women. Thus good old Michael Harrawood,
>who seems none to fond of the ladies in the first place, prefaced
>one of his earlier nasty cracks of the "how dare she variety"
>with a term of endearment usually reserved for friends, into
>which category he and I assuredly do not fall, if I can judge
>from the tenor of his spleen.
>
>In general, I have always found it to be a better course to begin
>by seeking to understand what could count as 'good' reasons why
>Heidegger settled on the instances he *did* choose as disclosive
>than to propose, as has been done more than once before on this list
>by the by, say, love (and Tom, if you are watching, all references
>to your name were fortuitous. I've nothing against you or your
>name, I liked some of the directions you seem to be moving in, just
>thought you could find much more inspiration in other fields
>than Heidegger's own) or "making Mommy proud" (credit: T. Blancato).
>
>But this is just my idea of rigor. It is, more than manifestly,
>a minority viewpoint. And, Dr. Clayton, since you mention books
>you've published on Heidegger, be aware that as yet I've done no
>such thing. I am a Nietzsche scholar, and I daresay even British
>libraries carry my book. Be my guest: look it up.
>
>I'll do the same, but your post hardly encourages me.
>
>See how mutual all this is?? Gives a new meaning to Heraclitus.
>
>Dr. B.E. Babich
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
I'm not a philosophy professor. And I say: go on Babette!
Antonio Tombolini
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---