Biographically, isn't there an obvious continuity, RC to Nazi,
>from sacred to profane, to be sure, but structurally,
i.e. institutionally and thematically?
Also, the tacks used to "justify" H: especially that his "thinking"
is autonomous (transcendant), like the "truth" of the Apostolic Church, entirely
discrete from his secular crimes... identical and identically dualistic ...
and that H's wisdom is wise beyond the wisdom of us mere men...
Why is it empirical observations such as these seem out of order, impertinent,
impudent...to H'ians?
The author of the recent Masterpiece Theatre, Signs & Wonders, casts
H in the aspect of a High Church "Moonie"...one cannot not feel the force
of the parallel, no?
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>from sacred to profane, to be sure, but structurally,
i.e. institutionally and thematically?
Also, the tacks used to "justify" H: especially that his "thinking"
is autonomous (transcendant), like the "truth" of the Apostolic Church, entirely
discrete from his secular crimes... identical and identically dualistic ...
and that H's wisdom is wise beyond the wisdom of us mere men...
Why is it empirical observations such as these seem out of order, impertinent,
impudent...to H'ians?
The author of the recent Masterpiece Theatre, Signs & Wonders, casts
H in the aspect of a High Church "Moonie"...one cannot not feel the force
of the parallel, no?
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---