>This understanding of being (standing presence) and aletheia (as the
>time-space clearing in which being presences as standing presence) are the
>guiding perspectives, the leading in-sights throughout the thinking of beyng
>known under the name 'Heidegger'. (We should perhaps learn slowly to
>strike out
>the name: 'Heidegger'.)
>Michael
Does being come to presence as standing presence? Or is the being of beings
given as standing presence, as presencing within the open clearing? I had
thought that being only gives itself in the withdrawal, concealing itself
in favour of the gift, of what comes to a stand in presence. Or is it
possible to think being qua being in terms of standing presence?
Malcolm
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>time-space clearing in which being presences as standing presence) are the
>guiding perspectives, the leading in-sights throughout the thinking of beyng
>known under the name 'Heidegger'. (We should perhaps learn slowly to
>strike out
>the name: 'Heidegger'.)
>Michael
Does being come to presence as standing presence? Or is the being of beings
given as standing presence, as presencing within the open clearing? I had
thought that being only gives itself in the withdrawal, concealing itself
in favour of the gift, of what comes to a stand in presence. Or is it
possible to think being qua being in terms of standing presence?
Malcolm
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---