RE: What is truth?

Well, if you're gonna paraphrase Nietzsche like a true believer you may =
as well cite chapter and verse. Then I can go read the master himself =
and you won't have to bother explaining yourself to me (not like you're =
trying... or are you?).=20

I'm intrigued by your phrase "actually, it would actually"... does it =
conceal some insight gained from your spiral into the abyss? (The spiral =
is the movement indicated by the Nietzsche quote, no?)

Am I still missing the point? If so, I've been drafted into good company =
with Socrates: knowing that I know nothing.

----------
From: Iain Thomson[SMTP:ithomson@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 1996 2:19 PM
To: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: What is truth?

Actually, it would actually be difficult for you to have missed my
point--paraphrased from Nietzsche--more completely.

>More to the point: "Everything is relative." The assertion asserts an
>absolute. Reductio ad absurdum, Q.E.D.
>

>>--"It's all relative."
>>"But then your statement is relative as well!"
>>--"Ah, so you understand..."
>
>>Iain
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---




--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---





--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---


Partial thread listing: