> being is not a being and thus (in your terms as well as Heidegger's
> {although not the same as each other}) does not "exist";
Agreed, but because beings are, their fact of being, it is. Being is being.
Being is.
Every being is, but not every being exists.
Tudor Georgescu
http://intellect-club.nl.eu.org
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
> {although not the same as each other}) does not "exist";
Agreed, but because beings are, their fact of being, it is. Being is being.
Being is.
Every being is, but not every being exists.
Tudor Georgescu
http://intellect-club.nl.eu.org
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---