Re: a kinda sad statistic

Which part is sad, that there are so many people who don't or rarely write
(like myself - oh, I listen, sometimes very intently, to the dichotomy
represented by MichaelP and Rene of compassion and purity, or boundless
creativity and focused unity, of delight and distress, or, or.., anyhow, a
daimon tends to stay my hand at the keys when the impulse to respond arises.
Better to witness than speak these days) or that there are so few people
where 'the many' are needed so it statistically bears out that more are
prone to post than lurk?



----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Johnson" <beeso@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 7:10 PM
Subject: RE: a kinda sad statistic


> >> >>>> who heidegger
> >>Members of list 'heidegger':
> >>
> >>sbasset@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Christian Koch <chk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >><nldiekel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >oh man this is a lot. Think of the possible. We could start sending posts
to
> >these first three and ask them what they think of our coversations. We
would
> >be flooded with talk.
> >
> >lol...
>
>
> ever thins relative plato, it used 'to be' a lot more, antedeluvian that
> is, u mite be rite to rite to them tho, lettuce both send a post thereunto
>
> u 1st
>
> lol... 2
>
> Kenneth
>
>
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---



--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

Folow-ups
  • Re: a kinda sad statistic
    • From: Ed Wall
  • Replies
    RE: a kinda sad statistic, Kenneth Johnson
    Partial thread listing: