>
>
>On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, jan straathof wrote:
>
>> >The route to an exploration of Being has to start with a being
>> >(Dasein) but I think it would be wrong to give Dasein the characteristic of
>> >being the Being of all living Beings.
>> >
>> >Nik
>> >
>>
>> I don't agree.
>> Franciscus of Assisi and Antonius of Padua preached (spoke) to the animals ?
>> They were no fools. (some even say they are Saints)
>>
>> jan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>>
>To all;
>I think that, as language is such a bridge to cross in study of
>Heidegger, that we should be careful to avoid doubletalk between Being
>and being, perhaps we could use *essent* for 'being', as the essent has
>essence, though Dasein has Being. Power of the wyrd is incalculable.
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
I've been confused by the whole of this conversation for several reasons.
>
>On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, jan straathof wrote:
>
>> >The route to an exploration of Being has to start with a being
>> >(Dasein) but I think it would be wrong to give Dasein the characteristic of
>> >being the Being of all living Beings.
>> >
>> >Nik
>> >
>>
>> I don't agree.
>> Franciscus of Assisi and Antonius of Padua preached (spoke) to the animals ?
>> They were no fools. (some even say they are Saints)
>>
>> jan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>>
>To all;
>I think that, as language is such a bridge to cross in study of
>Heidegger, that we should be careful to avoid doubletalk between Being
>and being, perhaps we could use *essent* for 'being', as the essent has
>essence, though Dasein has Being. Power of the wyrd is incalculable.
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
I've been confused by the whole of this conversation for several reasons.