Glad to see your computer is back to life.
Did u also note that the planners in DDA are bringing down land areas in
schools and want existing parks to be used as play grounds. As it is the Jal
Board has disconnected the existing tube wells and diverted these to their
water mains . Now the town planners want reduce whatever remains of parks
int cricket and foot ball grounds. Good luck to GREEN DELHI.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gita Dewan Verma" <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 5:57 PM
Subject: [mpisgmedia] Pollution and mixed land use!!
> POLLUTION CONTROL BODY SEEKS BAN ON MIXED LAND USE
> http://www.hindu.com/2004/10/26/stories/2004102611760400.htm
>
>
> someone tell more about this please.
>
> city invented in the industries imbroglio curious
> concept of non-conforming-area (as distinct from
> non-conforming use, non-conformity established by
> proving - like we are rightly told by court to do for
> our allegations of misuse - violations at all 3
> levels, viz, Master Plan, Zonal Plan and detailed /
> layout plan), curious concept currently coming in
> handy to use powers against misuse without having to
> establish misuse. Now it looks like city might be at
> start of new game - to obfuscate non-permissible
> commercial misuse of residential premises and
> permissible mixed-use premises (ie, residential
> premise with wee-bit non-residential use) to make out
> case for "regularising" former with proviso of parking
> (the only of many nuisances of unregulated mixing that
> has currently lucrative solutions).
>
> btw, mixed land use matters are pending disposal of
> s.11A Public Notice for liberalizing mlu regulations,
> High Court PIL about commercial premises, SLP in
> Supreme Court about commercial misuse of residential
> premises, etc. High Court PIL has been incredible - it
> was admitted (after dismissal of its prayer for
> quashing of tender for unrestricted disposal of
> commercial space) in October 2002 because the court
> desired to see about directions for future,
> respondents have repeatedly desired not to reply,
> petitioners were asked to file additional affidavit to
> show violations at all three levels, respondents have
> still not desired to reply, etc. covered in commerce
> section of ncmp-dmp minder (suspended following
> cognisable-offence hawker-policy moves instead of
> reply as ordered), at
> http://plan.architexturez.net/site/dmp2021/ncmp/c
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
Did u also note that the planners in DDA are bringing down land areas in
schools and want existing parks to be used as play grounds. As it is the Jal
Board has disconnected the existing tube wells and diverted these to their
water mains . Now the town planners want reduce whatever remains of parks
int cricket and foot ball grounds. Good luck to GREEN DELHI.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gita Dewan Verma" <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 5:57 PM
Subject: [mpisgmedia] Pollution and mixed land use!!
> POLLUTION CONTROL BODY SEEKS BAN ON MIXED LAND USE
> http://www.hindu.com/2004/10/26/stories/2004102611760400.htm
>
>
> someone tell more about this please.
>
> city invented in the industries imbroglio curious
> concept of non-conforming-area (as distinct from
> non-conforming use, non-conformity established by
> proving - like we are rightly told by court to do for
> our allegations of misuse - violations at all 3
> levels, viz, Master Plan, Zonal Plan and detailed /
> layout plan), curious concept currently coming in
> handy to use powers against misuse without having to
> establish misuse. Now it looks like city might be at
> start of new game - to obfuscate non-permissible
> commercial misuse of residential premises and
> permissible mixed-use premises (ie, residential
> premise with wee-bit non-residential use) to make out
> case for "regularising" former with proviso of parking
> (the only of many nuisances of unregulated mixing that
> has currently lucrative solutions).
>
> btw, mixed land use matters are pending disposal of
> s.11A Public Notice for liberalizing mlu regulations,
> High Court PIL about commercial premises, SLP in
> Supreme Court about commercial misuse of residential
> premises, etc. High Court PIL has been incredible - it
> was admitted (after dismissal of its prayer for
> quashing of tender for unrestricted disposal of
> commercial space) in October 2002 because the court
> desired to see about directions for future,
> respondents have repeatedly desired not to reply,
> petitioners were asked to file additional affidavit to
> show violations at all three levels, respondents have
> still not desired to reply, etc. covered in commerce
> section of ncmp-dmp minder (suspended following
> cognisable-offence hawker-policy moves instead of
> reply as ordered), at
> http://plan.architexturez.net/site/dmp2021/ncmp/c
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia