1. "gawd not another one" was in the context of
pioneer and that ufonline.org website.
2. I have nothing to do with drafting / undrafting of
dmp2021 - I leave that to the experts.
3. I view the MPD2021 blog as a blank canvas where
average joe citizens of Delhi like me can
collaboratively fine-tune their objections and
suggestions, and get criticised and corrected by
plannerly experts.
4. Right to information as Gita well knows is one of
my hobby horses. Better information means better
objections / suggestions.
5. Point about MPD2001 wrt MPD2021 is well taken, is
there any online / electronic version of MPD2001
available. As it is converting MPD2021 draft from PDF
files to a reasonably formatted text version is
working my fingers to the bone.
6. New Rule in the Blog : DDA bashing not permitted.
Start Blogging : PLEASE :-(
Sarbajit
--- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > A MPD2021 draft objections / suggestions blog is
> > online.
> > (Gawd not another one... )
> ....
> > http://mpd2021.blogspot.com
>
>
> in reply to:
> DMP2021 pubblic notice and bhagidaari
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/pipermail/mpisgmedia/2005-June/000371.html
>
>
>
> i want to clarify i have no gawd-not-another-one
> issue
> with sarabjit's blog because sarabjit has not been
> party to the making of dmp2021 / unmaking of
> dmp2001.
>
> maybe blog rules should have something against
> DDA-bashing and for reference to DMP2001.
>
> a distinction must be made between DDA the
> organisation and DDA the Authority. the latter has
> all
> tiers of government and others and appoints
> committees
> etc, all under DD Act, and if these act de-hors of
> the
> Act, there is no point blaming the former.
>
> Public Notice process is better viewed as safeguard
> to
> mind against downsizing of Plan entitlements /
> solutions rather than as alternative-Plan pushing
> opportunity. DMP-2021 is not new Plan but Plan
> revision, ie, rather than commenting on it in a
> vacuum, it is more meaningful to comment on
> comparison
> between DMP-2001 and DMP-2021. (Never mind larger
> promises of world-classiness and this or that; each
> little provision of DMP2001 is entitlement and it is
> the job of planners to cook up larger wholes without
> downsizing the parts).
>
> And please note: logical culmination of DDA-bashing
> /
> DMP-2001 ignoring trends is
> blind-men-around-elephant
> local-area-plan style urbanism in care of MCD /
> GNCTD
> multiplicity and its growing bhagidaars. hallelujah.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Discover Yahoo!
> Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for
> the weekend. Check it out!
> http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
pioneer and that ufonline.org website.
2. I have nothing to do with drafting / undrafting of
dmp2021 - I leave that to the experts.
3. I view the MPD2021 blog as a blank canvas where
average joe citizens of Delhi like me can
collaboratively fine-tune their objections and
suggestions, and get criticised and corrected by
plannerly experts.
4. Right to information as Gita well knows is one of
my hobby horses. Better information means better
objections / suggestions.
5. Point about MPD2001 wrt MPD2021 is well taken, is
there any online / electronic version of MPD2001
available. As it is converting MPD2021 draft from PDF
files to a reasonably formatted text version is
working my fingers to the bone.
6. New Rule in the Blog : DDA bashing not permitted.
Start Blogging : PLEASE :-(
Sarbajit
--- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > A MPD2021 draft objections / suggestions blog is
> > online.
> > (Gawd not another one... )
> ....
> > http://mpd2021.blogspot.com
>
>
> in reply to:
> DMP2021 pubblic notice and bhagidaari
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/pipermail/mpisgmedia/2005-June/000371.html
>
>
>
> i want to clarify i have no gawd-not-another-one
> issue
> with sarabjit's blog because sarabjit has not been
> party to the making of dmp2021 / unmaking of
> dmp2001.
>
> maybe blog rules should have something against
> DDA-bashing and for reference to DMP2001.
>
> a distinction must be made between DDA the
> organisation and DDA the Authority. the latter has
> all
> tiers of government and others and appoints
> committees
> etc, all under DD Act, and if these act de-hors of
> the
> Act, there is no point blaming the former.
>
> Public Notice process is better viewed as safeguard
> to
> mind against downsizing of Plan entitlements /
> solutions rather than as alternative-Plan pushing
> opportunity. DMP-2021 is not new Plan but Plan
> revision, ie, rather than commenting on it in a
> vacuum, it is more meaningful to comment on
> comparison
> between DMP-2001 and DMP-2021. (Never mind larger
> promises of world-classiness and this or that; each
> little provision of DMP2001 is entitlement and it is
> the job of planners to cook up larger wholes without
> downsizing the parts).
>
> And please note: logical culmination of DDA-bashing
> /
> DMP-2001 ignoring trends is
> blind-men-around-elephant
> local-area-plan style urbanism in care of MCD /
> GNCTD
> multiplicity and its growing bhagidaars. hallelujah.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Discover Yahoo!
> Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for
> the weekend. Check it out!
> http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com