Re: [mpisgmedia] Arjun Camp cases: Judgment

Read the judgement. !!!!!!!

It is so very different from many others on the issue and also from what was
reported in the media. For once we are not calling slum residents
'encroachers' and how petitioners have told how to do calculations correctly
and how Anil Baijal has misconceived understanding of the law and how and
why master plan entitlements are owed to slum residents!

III year B.Planning students are taking this up as a studio exercise
(preparation of the scheme). where can I get more information on this and
any suggestions on if there are others who may be interested.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gita Dewan Verma" <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:30 AM
Subject: [mpisgmedia] Arjun Camp cases: Judgment


> We have certified copy of the judgment in the Arjun
> Camp cases. Typed text is at:
> http://plan.architexturez.org/site/mpisg/h/arjun-camp-judgment
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia + Planning
collaborative at http://plan.architexturez.org/
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/406 - Release Date: 8/2/06
>
>



--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/407 - Release Date: 8/3/06


Folow-ups
  • Re: [mpisgmedia] Arjun Camp cases: Judgment
    • From: Architexturez.
  • Replies
    [mpisgmedia] Arjun Camp cases: Judgment, Gita Dewan Verma
    Partial thread listing: