Vroummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!! Nature = Beauty?
Perceive me as a stream of mist:
my heart, where chortles come to beat,
is made to stomp all poets' hate,
laughing and vital as matter itself.
With sweat for flesh, with heat for heart,
I sit in the mud, an undressed stinx
enjoying acts that falter forms;
I always laugh, I never weep.
With flippant haws the masses gasp
- this emperor has no clothes,
and to free these mutant lovers at last
I melt the world with a ruddy gleam:
The twinkling of my eyes wide shut.
warmly and kindly, La mark
P.S. Did you know, there's a new book, _Quantum
Evolution: The New Science of Life_ by Johnjoe
Mcfadden which claims, the cover says, "that evolution
may not be random at all. Rather, it may be directed -
that is, in certain instances, cells may be able to
choose to mutate particular genes that provide an
advantage in their environment". (Now that would be a
decent modification ;)
--- vroummmm <vroummmm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> difficult to deal with such 'sacred'
> words as 'natural'.
>
> Hi M.C.
>
> artificial has molarly been/will be attributed to
> human productions, as in les
> flowers del malo, the artificial artificiels
> paradises, are producing
> modifications in Baudelaire's verses attributions?
> the beauty being a virtual
> side to the modifications? the beauty, as i
> understand daniel and deleuze
> understands it, is only understood when you
> contereffects it, so the verases,
> the poetry, are sacred? Baudelaire and Lamartine
> think you can't contereffect
> beauty, if you are not producing it (vrooomz not
> pretending doing so here)
> i.e. if you are not working to vectorialize
> multiplicities, fill the void,
> which is ugliness? of course, at your level, or d's
> speeds, which is "infinite
> speed" tracing figures of delights, concepts, like
> pre-socratics had done, on
> the i.plane, beauty is there, "love all around you".
> But Beaudelaire sees
> ugliness everywhere: why is this spleen suggestion,
> when he is talking about
> Brussels or London? why he is disgusted with Lamark,
> who sees love in the
> wavelets of the polluted Seine: Lamark, to him, is
> producing ugliness.
> idealizing beauty, ugliness needs, not to get
> transcended, but matched with
> ugliness. ugliness is when the material and the
> elements of it, are worked in
> accord with human productions (past), that's why a
> material needs discord.
>
> best,
> Baudelaire/Lamark
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail ? Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
Perceive me as a stream of mist:
my heart, where chortles come to beat,
is made to stomp all poets' hate,
laughing and vital as matter itself.
With sweat for flesh, with heat for heart,
I sit in the mud, an undressed stinx
enjoying acts that falter forms;
I always laugh, I never weep.
With flippant haws the masses gasp
- this emperor has no clothes,
and to free these mutant lovers at last
I melt the world with a ruddy gleam:
The twinkling of my eyes wide shut.
warmly and kindly, La mark
P.S. Did you know, there's a new book, _Quantum
Evolution: The New Science of Life_ by Johnjoe
Mcfadden which claims, the cover says, "that evolution
may not be random at all. Rather, it may be directed -
that is, in certain instances, cells may be able to
choose to mutate particular genes that provide an
advantage in their environment". (Now that would be a
decent modification ;)
--- vroummmm <vroummmm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> difficult to deal with such 'sacred'
> words as 'natural'.
>
> Hi M.C.
>
> artificial has molarly been/will be attributed to
> human productions, as in les
> flowers del malo, the artificial artificiels
> paradises, are producing
> modifications in Baudelaire's verses attributions?
> the beauty being a virtual
> side to the modifications? the beauty, as i
> understand daniel and deleuze
> understands it, is only understood when you
> contereffects it, so the verases,
> the poetry, are sacred? Baudelaire and Lamartine
> think you can't contereffect
> beauty, if you are not producing it (vrooomz not
> pretending doing so here)
> i.e. if you are not working to vectorialize
> multiplicities, fill the void,
> which is ugliness? of course, at your level, or d's
> speeds, which is "infinite
> speed" tracing figures of delights, concepts, like
> pre-socratics had done, on
> the i.plane, beauty is there, "love all around you".
> But Beaudelaire sees
> ugliness everywhere: why is this spleen suggestion,
> when he is talking about
> Brussels or London? why he is disgusted with Lamark,
> who sees love in the
> wavelets of the polluted Seine: Lamark, to him, is
> producing ugliness.
> idealizing beauty, ugliness needs, not to get
> transcended, but matched with
> ugliness. ugliness is when the material and the
> elements of it, are worked in
> accord with human productions (past), that's why a
> material needs discord.
>
> best,
> Baudelaire/Lamark
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail ? Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/