- Re: non-phonetic writing, etc.
- From: John Appleby
- Re: the "nonphonetic moment"... oooh scary!
- From: daniel haines
- Re: non-phonetic writing, etc.
- From: steve.devos
- Re: the "nonphonetic moment"... oooh scary!
- From: daniel haines
- Re: the "nonphonetic moment"... oooh scary!
- From: daniel haines
- Re: non-phonetic writing, etc.
- From: daniel haines
- Re: non-phonetic writing, etc.
- From: Karen Ocana
- Re: non-phonetic writing, etc.
- From: Chris McMahon
- Signs signalling
- From: Paul Bains
- Re: the "nonphonetic moment"... oooh scary!
- From: Chris McMahon
- Saussure & Hjelmslev
- From: B. Metcalf
- Re: non-phonetic writing, etc.
- From: Chris McMahon
- Re: Intuition as Method
- From: Paul Bryant
- Re: n-p writing, etc.
- From: Karen Ocana
- Re: Intuition as Method
- From: Inna Runova Semetsky
- Re: the "nonphonetic moment"... oooh scary!
- From: Jjajayjayt
- Re: Intuition as Method
- From: Paul Bryant
- Re: Intuition as Method
- From: Inna Runova Semetsky
- Re: the "nonphonetic moment"... oooh scary!
- From: michelle phil lewis king
- Re: Intuition as Method
- From: Cecile Ramirez
- laughs with
- From: janine mackintosh
- re: laughs
- From: Karen Ocana
- the morning after (ah! no hangover)
- From: Karen Ocana
- Re: the "nonphonetic moment"... oooh scary!
- From: daniel haines
- Re: who laughs with ?
- From: daniel haines
- getting started?
- From: William J King
- Re: deleuze-guattari-digest V2 #585
- From: janine mackintosh
- Re:
- From: Inna Runova Semetsky
- Re: deleuze-guattari-digest V2 #585
- From: Jane Salem
- on the intolerable...
- From: G. Coonfield
- Re: deleuze-guattari-digest V2 #585
- From: Karen Ocana
- RE: deleuze-guattari-digest V2 #585
- From: steve.devos
- RE: deleuze-guattari-digest V2 #585
- From: steve.devos
- Reading Difference and Repetition (fwd)
- From: Ben B. Day
- Re: the "nonphonetic moment"... oooh scary!
- From: daniel haines
- Laughs
- From: I Am Bobo
- Re: laugh-riot
- From: daniel haines
- Re: on the intolerable...
- From: daniel haines
- Re: Reading Difference and Repetition (fwd)
- From: daniel haines
- Re: on the intolerable...
- From: Dan Smith
- Re: on the intolerable...
- From: daniel haines
- Re: Reading Difference and Repetition (fwd)
- From: Ben B. Day
- Re: on the intolerable...
- From: G. Coonfield
- Re: on the intolerable...
- From: Dan Smith
- Re: on the intolerable...
- From: Karen Ocana
- Re: Laughs
- From: steve.devos
- Re: on the intolerable...
- From: G. Coonfield
- Re: laugh-riot
- From: I Am Bobo
- Re: laugh-riot/communication
- From: daniel haines
- Re: on the intolerable...
- From: Karen Ocana
- Re: on the intolerable...
- From: G. Coonfield
- Sommebody else in the mud
- From: janine mackintosh
- I love the Way
- From: Eurydice
- Re: laugh-riot/let's count to two
- From: I Am Bobo
- new thread
- From: vroummmm
- virginia woolf edu's classifieds - add 258#75
- From: vroummmm
- suh par musekeyhole
- From: Daniel Carter
- sound directions lightly touch(: it's) curtains drapery shy-
- From: Daniel Carter
- let's count to two/"through a glass, darkly"
- From: daniel haines
- HOMAGE TO DANIEL CARTER WHO IS YOUR LOVER
- From: janine mackintosh
- Re: virginia woolf edu's classifieds - add 258#75
- From: steve.devos
- Re: HOMAGE TO DANIEL CARTER WHO IS YOUR LOVER
- From: michelle phil lewis king
- Re: let's count to two/"through a glass, darkly"
- From: Mark Crosby
- http://switch.to/capital
- From: daniel haines
- RE: on the intolerable...
- From: vroummmm
- RE: CALL FOR PAPERS -- DELEUZE IN 21ST CENTURY
- From: vroummmm
- deleuze and demosthenes
- From: vroummmm
- RE:
- From: vroummmm
- bad consciousness is okay to me
- From: vroummmm
- ciao!
- From: vroummmm
- Re: HOMAGE TO DANIEL CARTER WHO IS YOUR LOVER
- From: Steven Pukallus
- Re: HOMAGE TO DANIEL CARTER WHO IS YOUR LOVER
- From: steve.devos
- Re: HOMAGE TO DANIEL CARTER WHO IS YOUR LOVER
- From: daniel haines
- Re: "through a glass, darkly" yes, exactly
- From: I Am Bobo
- searching "Will to Power" (à procura de Vontade de
- From: Eduardo Simonini Lopes
- Re: "through a glass, darkly" yes, exactly
- From: daniel haines
- assssss
- From: Eurydice
- [no subject]
- From: Carlos Eduardo Estellita Lins
- Re: aster
- From: Karen Ocana
- nietzsche's "will to power"
- From: Paulo Akamine
- Re: FW: Scientists break speed of light or Is it the Faster
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: "through a glass, darkly" yes, exactly
- From: I Am Bobo
- Re: HOMAGE TO DANIEL CARTER WHO IS YOUR LOVER
- From: steve.devos
- Re: "through a glass, darkly" yes, exactly
- From: Paul Bryant
- Re: "through a glass, darkly" yes, exactly
- From: Karen Ocana
- Re: "through a glass, darkly" yes, exactly
- From: John Hartmann
- Re: "through a glass, darkly" yes, exactly
- From: Paul Bryant
- Re: "through a glass, darkly" yes, exactly
- From: Paul Bryant
- RE: FW: Scientists break speed of light or Is it the Faster Compu
- From: Widder,NE
- re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: daniel haines
- re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: I Am Bobo
- re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Chris McMahon
- re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Paul Bryant
- Re: "through a glass, darkly"
- From: B. Metcalf
- Re: "through a glass, darkly"
- From: Paul Bryant
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: daniel haines
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: I Am Bobo
- For Felix
- From: Mike Sanders
- Fight Club
- From: Chris McMahon
- Secrecy and fascism
- From: Chris McMahon
- Re: "through a glass, darkly"
- From: B. Metcalf
- Re: "through a glass, darkly" yes, exactly
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: RE: FW: Scientists break speed of light or Is it the
- From: Ruth Chandler
- don' talk about your penis
- From: vroummmm
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: daniel haines
- Re: let's count to two/"through a glass, darkly"
- From: daniel haines
- RE: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: vroummmm
- Re: "through a glass, darkly"
- From: Inna Runova Semetsky
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: I Am Bobo
- RE: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: I Am Bobo
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Chris McMahon
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: daniel haines
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: daniel haines
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Chris McMahon
- Castration becoming horse?
- From: Chris McMahon
- RE: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: vroummmm
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: let's count to two/"through a glass, darkly"
- From: Mark Crosby
- RE: let's count to two/"through a glass, darkly": ugli-beaut-y-loch-nesz
- From: vroummmm
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: I Am Bobo
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: I Am Bobo
- RE: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Chris McMahon
- Re: let's count to two/"through a glass, darkly"
- From: Chris McMahon
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Chris McMahon
- Re: don' talk about your penis
- From: Daniel Carter
- § fun
- From: isa
- RE: don' talk about your penis
- From: vroummmm
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Ja'far Railton
- RE: let's count to two/"through a glass, darkly": ugli-beaut-y-loch-nesz
- From: Mark Crosby
- RE: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: vroummmm
- RE: let's count to two/"through a glass, darkly": ugli-beaut-y-loch-nesz
- From: vroummmm
- RE: let's count to two/"through a glass, darkly": ugli-beaut-y-loch-nesz
- From: Mark Crosby
- Horsey's castration: happy to be a hornet
- From: Mike Sanders
- horsey's heads and tales
- From: Mike Sanders
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: I Am Bobo
- RE: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: I Am Bobo
- RE: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Chris McMahon
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: Go and chess
- From: Ruth Chandler
- schismogenesis/Epona's lillies
- From: Mike Sanders
- Lupus Botanicus Negotiator
- From: Mike Sanders
- refs
- From: Mike Sanders
- dig deeper, pork soda
- From: Mike Sanders
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: ja'far railton
- Schreber becoming-woman
- From: Iris Lavell
- bris-vegas, post- theory - concrete or abstract?
- From: Steven Pukallus
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Ahmad Abu Baker
- Re: Schreber becoming-woman
- From: Paul Bains
- Re: Go and chess
- From: Borys
- wei-ch'i(Go)/wolves of heaven
- From: Mike Sanders
- D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Kym McCauley
- Re: Schreber becoming-woman
- From: Iris Lavell
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Chris McMahon
- D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Kym McCauley
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Chris McMahon
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Vanessa Pappas
- Re: Schreber becoming-woman
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Fwd: [human-nature-info] Hist. of Intellectual Culture
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: bris-vegas, post- theory - concrete or abstract?
- From: Shaun Rawolle
- Re: Link to Sloterdijk
- From: Wouter Kusters
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Chris McMahon
- Re: Schreber becoming-woman
- From: Iris Lavell
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Jjajayjayt
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Step
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Kym McCauley
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Rick Dolphijn
- Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: William J King
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: Charles J. Stivale
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: Inna Runova Semetsky
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Chris McMahon
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: I Am Bobo
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Vanessa
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: Paul Bryant
- Remove Re: deleuze-guattari-digest V2 #612
- From: VerusEx
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: Inna Runova Semetsky
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: Robert Pirani
- Re: Link to Sloterdijk
- From: Paul Bains
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: Paul Bryant
- Re: Link to Sloterdijk
- From: Wouter Kusters
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: Inna Runova Semetsky
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: Inna Runova Semetsky
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Ja'far Railton
- Michelle Pfeiffer and Lacan/horsies,wolves
- From: Mike Sanders
- Re: Link to Sloterdijk
- From: Paul Bains
- Re: "speaking as if castration doesn't exist!"
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: Jon Rubin
- Re: Difficulty reading Deleuze?
- From: HOWARD FRIEDMAN
- Re: venusia'sEpona's schismogenesis 2 everybody 2 the list
- From: venusia
- RE: venusia'sEpona's schismogenesis 2 everybody 2 the list
- From: vroummmm
- RE: venusia'sEpona's schismogenesis 2 everybody 2 the list
- From: venusia
- name of a ...plant
- From: Mike Sanders
- RE: schizmogeneses
- From: vroummmm
- Re: schizmogeneses
- From: Desktop Deskbottom
- Re: schizmogeneses
- From: venusia
- RE: schizmogeneses
- From: vroummmm
- Re: Schismo-geneses
- From: Desktop Deskbottom
- Re: schizmogeneses
- From: venusia
- Re: schizmogeneses
- From: venusia
- Re: schizmogeneses
- From: Desktop Deskbottom
- RE: schizmogeneses
- From: vroummmm
- RE: schizmogeneses
- From: vroummmm
- Re: schizmo-geneses
- From: venusia
- RE: biunivocity.tussen rgb & vrooom, there is biunivocity...
- From: vroummmm
- biunivocity.tussen rgb & vrooom, there is biunivocity...
- From: Desktop Deskbottom
- om way planetoid air
- From: Daniel Carter
- scar because some space
- From: Daniel Carter
- slip-sipping text
- From: Daniel Carter
- Lines of flight
- From: Sap, H.A
- La Borde Q
- From: John Muckelbauer
- RE: La Borde Q
- From: vroummmm
- RE: Lines of flight
- From: vroummmm
- Re: La Borde Q
- From: Paul Bains
- Voyeurism
- From: Greg Wise
- Re: Lines of flight
- From: Rick Dolphijn
- Fwd: Fulbright Opportunities in Psychology
- From: Ruth Chandler
- RE: Lines of flight
- From: vroummmm
- Australian aborigines and nomadology
- From: Steven Pukallus
- Difference and repitition again
- From: Jens Kjærulff
- Re: Australian aborigines and nomadology
- From: Jon Rubin
- vrom Clinic
- From: janine mackintosh
- RE: Lines of flight
- From: Rick Dolphijn
- Re: Difference and repitition again
- From: Rick Dolphijn
- Re: Lines of flight
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Steven Pukallus
- Re: D&G and the tree-logic of day-to-day life
- From: Steven Pukallus
- RE: vrom Clinic
- From: vroummmm
- Deleuze and narrative theory
- From: Chris Jones
- Eternal Return of the Same
- From: John Appleby
- Re: Eternal Return of the Same
- From: dan smith
- RE: Eternal Return of the Same
- From: Widder,NE
- friends
- From: janine mackintosh
- Re: Eternal Return of the Same
- From: John Appleby
- Re: Eternal Return of the Same
- From: Inna Runova Semetsky
- Re: Eternal Return of the Same
- From: Michael Rooney
- deleuze vs kierkegaard
- From: MATTHEW KEARNES
- FYI: new mailing-list on Sloterdijk
- From: Wouter Kusters
- Re: Difference and repitition again
- From: Jens Kjærulff
- Re: Deleuze and narrative theory
- From: dan smith
- Re: Eternal Return of the Same
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: deleuze vs kierkegaard
- From: Greg J. Seigworth
- Re: Deleuze and narrative theory
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Re: Deleuze and narrative theory
- From: Ruth Chandler
- Ideal synthesis of the difference
- From: Ruy Gardnier
- Re: deleuze vs kierkegaard
- From: Ruy Gardnier
- Peace and Tom-Tom
- From: Eurydice
- aborigine
- From: Jocelyn Braddell
- Re: Deleuze and narrative theory
- From: Chris McMahon
- Re: Eternal Return of the Same
- From: Paul Bains
- Re: Eternal Return of the Same
- From: Nathan Widder
- Re Deleuze and narrative
- From: Chris Jones
- Re: Deleuze and narrative theory
- From: Ruth Chandler