Dear Ray,
are you kidding? Your comment:
"Most of them are sort of off-key and not very good representations of
Derrida, ie. Wigley."
spn: Ray, Wigley is one of the best that architecture has in the
extremely difficult task of thinking architecture. We have much to learn
from his _The Architecture of Deconstruction_. MIT 1994. I also have a
particular interest in Mark's work because I am very familiar with his
primary thesis that entails his Heideggerian entry into Deconstruction.
So again, stop thumbing your nose at what you really don't know.
sp(i)n
are you kidding? Your comment:
"Most of them are sort of off-key and not very good representations of
Derrida, ie. Wigley."
spn: Ray, Wigley is one of the best that architecture has in the
extremely difficult task of thinking architecture. We have much to learn
from his _The Architecture of Deconstruction_. MIT 1994. I also have a
particular interest in Mark's work because I am very familiar with his
primary thesis that entails his Heideggerian entry into Deconstruction.
So again, stop thumbing your nose at what you really don't know.
sp(i)n