>
>I am rather opposed to reading secondary sources. Most of them are sort
>of off-key and not very good representations of Derrida, ie. Wigley.
>
>- Ray
ray,
I don't think there is a better reader of the architectural implications of
Derrida's work than Wigley. Have you taken a close look at his book,
'Derrida's Haunt'? It is a tour de force.
rma
>I am rather opposed to reading secondary sources. Most of them are sort
>of off-key and not very good representations of Derrida, ie. Wigley.
>
>- Ray
ray,
I don't think there is a better reader of the architectural implications of
Derrida's work than Wigley. Have you taken a close look at his book,
'Derrida's Haunt'? It is a tour de force.
rma