Nic:
>this list comprises, it seems to me, of people who talk is a
>dysfunctional and haphazard way about design issues, though mostly
>architecture. This accurately reflects the profession, and if
>anything, makes it seem better than it actually is. None one cares
>about this list, frequently not even the participants, but that too
>reflects the profession. Its an index of the difficulty of making an
>interested community without the promise of glossy publication
>credits or glossy clients or glossy tenure.
As Philippe Starck's recently observed (Design Week, 14 March 1997)
'Architects? Aren't they the people who abandoned duty in favour of
status?'
alpha dog
>this list comprises, it seems to me, of people who talk is a
>dysfunctional and haphazard way about design issues, though mostly
>architecture. This accurately reflects the profession, and if
>anything, makes it seem better than it actually is. None one cares
>about this list, frequently not even the participants, but that too
>reflects the profession. Its an index of the difficulty of making an
>interested community without the promise of glossy publication
>credits or glossy clients or glossy tenure.
As Philippe Starck's recently observed (Design Week, 14 March 1997)
'Architects? Aren't they the people who abandoned duty in favour of
status?'
alpha dog