>(extreme architecture - international space-station..?) -- you "raise" here
>the international space-station and at the same time question whether there
>is still an outside-inside??? come on, let's not waste time disputing the
>obvious and move one to a clearer, deeper understanding of outside vs.
>inside in order to create a better architecture.
i tried to address (is there still an inside-outside) question in
the "inside-outside paradox" post. bc
>the international space-station and at the same time question whether there
>is still an outside-inside??? come on, let's not waste time disputing the
>obvious and move one to a clearer, deeper understanding of outside vs.
>inside in order to create a better architecture.
i tried to address (is there still an inside-outside) question in
the "inside-outside paradox" post. bc