> Here's a bit of a shock I want to share. I've read HOW ARCHITECTURE GOT ITS
> HUMP over the last Wednesday to Wednesday week, and in chapter 5, the last
> chapter, I was shocked to read on page 152:
>
> "Are Gehry and Rauschenburg's binoculars in Los Angeles the upturned result
> of sculpture freed from a toothpaste image of softness? Just what have these
> installations got to do with architecture's own program?"
are those authorized authors the masters of such Programs ? what's, anyway,
the "architecture's program" ???.
are architects to be programmed as are some software inventors ?
> HUMP over the last Wednesday to Wednesday week, and in chapter 5, the last
> chapter, I was shocked to read on page 152:
>
> "Are Gehry and Rauschenburg's binoculars in Los Angeles the upturned result
> of sculpture freed from a toothpaste image of softness? Just what have these
> installations got to do with architecture's own program?"
are those authorized authors the masters of such Programs ? what's, anyway,
the "architecture's program" ???.
are architects to be programmed as are some software inventors ?