Giorgio Agamben has a fine piece called "La passion de la facticite':
Heidegger et le proble'me de l'amour" published in HEIDEGGER: QUESTIONS
OUVERTES, CAHIERS DU COLL`EGE INT. DE PHIL., n. 6, 1988 pp. 63-84. A
translation of it is forthcoming in THE ANCIENTS AND THE MODERNS, Indiana U.P.
Reg
>I hate taking a lot of space in my posts. So, just a cryptic one.
>Nancy makes Heidegger speak about love (The Inoperative Community). But I
>think Heidegger himself in BT (somewhere, I'll try to find where) says that
>love as death authenticates . The closeness of the two is more apparent if
>one does not understand the authenticity as individualization (as Mitch
>does). Dasein cannot be without being Mitsein, without being "with".
>Petar Ramadanovic
>
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
Heidegger et le proble'me de l'amour" published in HEIDEGGER: QUESTIONS
OUVERTES, CAHIERS DU COLL`EGE INT. DE PHIL., n. 6, 1988 pp. 63-84. A
translation of it is forthcoming in THE ANCIENTS AND THE MODERNS, Indiana U.P.
Reg
>I hate taking a lot of space in my posts. So, just a cryptic one.
>Nancy makes Heidegger speak about love (The Inoperative Community). But I
>think Heidegger himself in BT (somewhere, I'll try to find where) says that
>love as death authenticates . The closeness of the two is more apparent if
>one does not understand the authenticity as individualization (as Mitch
>does). Dasein cannot be without being Mitsein, without being "with".
>Petar Ramadanovic
>
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---