Excuse my naivete. Any comments or direction for further study would be much
appreciated.
Question is of the openess which clears the "between" where it is possible
for a subject-object "relationship" to "be" and how (if) this openess can
allow for women's lived experience as objects or as "other" in our
Euro-American cultures. A phenomenon whereby that shows itself -- the looking
upon-gaze or in rape -- what is that naming? Part of the phenomenon is its
historicity. But I want to move to a deeper showing. This is not merely a
distinction of location of action raper, rapee. The object is not inactivity
-- it mirrors a phenomenological attitude. Is there something in the
phenomenological experience of "objectifying subjectivism" that withdraws, is
hidden? Where the place of greatest danger would lie the greatest possibility
of uncovering?
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
appreciated.
Question is of the openess which clears the "between" where it is possible
for a subject-object "relationship" to "be" and how (if) this openess can
allow for women's lived experience as objects or as "other" in our
Euro-American cultures. A phenomenon whereby that shows itself -- the looking
upon-gaze or in rape -- what is that naming? Part of the phenomenon is its
historicity. But I want to move to a deeper showing. This is not merely a
distinction of location of action raper, rapee. The object is not inactivity
-- it mirrors a phenomenological attitude. Is there something in the
phenomenological experience of "objectifying subjectivism" that withdraws, is
hidden? Where the place of greatest danger would lie the greatest possibility
of uncovering?
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---