Mr. Pennamacoor,
> Thinking ("Heidegger as Being") is *closeness* to Being *not* Being it self.
But a good greek philosopher said:
"To gar auto voein estin te kai einai."
>. None perhaps can succeed since paths are merely
>beings that cover the revelations they reveal, but: does that mean they are
>deceptions?
I do not mean that beings are deceptions: I said that your metaphysical
explanation is quite deceiving.
> (you can't make an ommelette without breaking the egg, etc).
This is technically false.
> More than anyone Heidegger gave thought to the essentially questionable
(because questioning) the essentially enigmatic the essentially perverse
nature of human existence:
>such essentially problematic nature becomes the key to the human's access
>to Being
There is no "nature" of Dasein in Heidegger. Your reading is still too
metaphysical.
>-- human-being is the being that questions Being (often through
>questioning beings --science), that puts Being into question.
What do you think about the influence of Hermann Cohen's "being as problem"
conceptions in Heidegger's thought?
>In 'Conversation on a country path' Heidegger has a scholar realise
>"Evidently the nature of man is released to that-which-regions because this
>belongs to it so essentially, that without man that-which-regions can not
>be a coming forth of all natures, as it is." (From 'Gelassenheit')
These Heidegger's words are very close to Ortega y Gasset's conception of
life and circumstance.
>Let us think.
Good!
Regards
R.F.
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
> Thinking ("Heidegger as Being") is *closeness* to Being *not* Being it self.
But a good greek philosopher said:
"To gar auto voein estin te kai einai."
>. None perhaps can succeed since paths are merely
>beings that cover the revelations they reveal, but: does that mean they are
>deceptions?
I do not mean that beings are deceptions: I said that your metaphysical
explanation is quite deceiving.
> (you can't make an ommelette without breaking the egg, etc).
This is technically false.
> More than anyone Heidegger gave thought to the essentially questionable
(because questioning) the essentially enigmatic the essentially perverse
nature of human existence:
>such essentially problematic nature becomes the key to the human's access
>to Being
There is no "nature" of Dasein in Heidegger. Your reading is still too
metaphysical.
>-- human-being is the being that questions Being (often through
>questioning beings --science), that puts Being into question.
What do you think about the influence of Hermann Cohen's "being as problem"
conceptions in Heidegger's thought?
>In 'Conversation on a country path' Heidegger has a scholar realise
>"Evidently the nature of man is released to that-which-regions because this
>belongs to it so essentially, that without man that-which-regions can not
>be a coming forth of all natures, as it is." (From 'Gelassenheit')
These Heidegger's words are very close to Ortega y Gasset's conception of
life and circumstance.
>Let us think.
Good!
Regards
R.F.
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---