Egad! Anyone who dares to suggest Heidegger got the History of Being =
wrong (or who suspects Heidegger's Aristotle speaks with a muffled voice =
and Heidegger's Aquinas is gagged) is a religious dogmatist or Thomist?
Beware the Heideggerian pose: All are fools, save the "thinkers". =
Dismiss the fools!
----------
From: henry sholar[SMTP:H_SHOLAR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 1996 8:36 AM
To: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: What is truth?
i, too, have sensed the all-too-familiar economies of logic, desire & =
emotion
(not to mention the aroma) of the workshops of the thomists...=20
it's been an amusing string to lurk, sit-com-esque
>Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 20:19:47 -0400 (EDT)
>From: "C'EST QUOI, L'ETERNITE? C'EST LA MER ALLEE AVEC LE =
SOLEIL"
> <90DOSS@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: What is truth?
>To: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Reply-to: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>In precisely what way is H's history of Being supposed to be inadequate =
>(methinks I spy religious dogmatics lurking in the background, but I
>refrain from judgment)?
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
wrong (or who suspects Heidegger's Aristotle speaks with a muffled voice =
and Heidegger's Aquinas is gagged) is a religious dogmatist or Thomist?
Beware the Heideggerian pose: All are fools, save the "thinkers". =
Dismiss the fools!
----------
From: henry sholar[SMTP:H_SHOLAR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 1996 8:36 AM
To: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: What is truth?
i, too, have sensed the all-too-familiar economies of logic, desire & =
emotion
(not to mention the aroma) of the workshops of the thomists...=20
it's been an amusing string to lurk, sit-com-esque
>Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 20:19:47 -0400 (EDT)
>From: "C'EST QUOI, L'ETERNITE? C'EST LA MER ALLEE AVEC LE =
SOLEIL"
> <90DOSS@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: What is truth?
>To: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Reply-to: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>In precisely what way is H's history of Being supposed to be inadequate =
>(methinks I spy religious dogmatics lurking in the background, but I
>refrain from judgment)?
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---