A good piece of rhetorical writing rene - you'd make a wonderful
anti-Heideggerian. Ever thought about it? ;-)
the thought has always been near, Jud. In fact one has to be antiheidegger
in order to find one's ownmost, a trap of one's own, as Hannah wrote, and
find out much later.
Your critics touch the Heideggerians who follow a leader, and therefore
need an 'interpretation' of their own. But you have the hybris to go for the leader
- but suddenly you're getting so dumb - every time you see anti-Heidegger pulp,
you're convinced to have won the lottery. "I knew it."
"i knew it" is rancor, not philosophy. Find the 'fatherland', the trap, of that rancor,
that's worth thousand times more than anti-Hun sarcasm.
otherwise sometimes somebody -not just anybody- gets very annoyed.
rene
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
anti-Heideggerian. Ever thought about it? ;-)
the thought has always been near, Jud. In fact one has to be antiheidegger
in order to find one's ownmost, a trap of one's own, as Hannah wrote, and
find out much later.
Your critics touch the Heideggerians who follow a leader, and therefore
need an 'interpretation' of their own. But you have the hybris to go for the leader
- but suddenly you're getting so dumb - every time you see anti-Heidegger pulp,
you're convinced to have won the lottery. "I knew it."
"i knew it" is rancor, not philosophy. Find the 'fatherland', the trap, of that rancor,
that's worth thousand times more than anti-Hun sarcasm.
otherwise sometimes somebody -not just anybody- gets very annoyed.
rene
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---