post was re BPO interest (not grandma/other assets).
professions at large are not involved in GATS
decisions, nor in making any assessment of trend. plan
revisions countrywide seem to have seen less (esp
young) professional involvement this time and global
pre-occupations might be a factor. I havent seen the
tehelka list. does it distinguish between assets and
interests of baba-log that has decision-takers wrapped
around baby-finger?
re delhi assembly: industries, slums, hawkers,
schools, bijli-paani are all steady on their drift;
anil-n-mukesh harsh-n-jolly ghulam-n-begum are all
wanting the same and i think their histrionics are not
worth watching. the Bills are, but in the obfuscation
of legislature and theatre those are not being
discussed. like GATS is not being discussed.
- gita
--- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Gita,
>
> What is the purpose of this post? That is other than
> psuedo-KGB disinformation harking back to his
> Grandmother's days - which IS so much in the news
> nowadays.
>
> In any case, Rahul's assets are listed out in the
> latest Tehelka.
>
> Surely you are not implying that if anyone avails
> drawing and drafting services from Rahul's company -
> they will bag all these big projects?
>
> Perhaps we should focus closer to home, how all
> these
> rogue Congress MLA's of Delhi are alleging
> /rumouring
> from the rooftops that Shiela-ji has taken 300
> crores
> from the DISCOMs .. 200 crores of which went to you
> know who. Did you know that Mukesh Sharma was
> ejected
> by Marshals from the House yesterday BEFORE Vijay
> Jolly with all his "blackshirts" .. I find
> (incredibly) their fashion sense 2B sartorially and
> politically correct.
>
> Incidentally Mukesh Sharma (along with neophyte
> sidekick MLA Anil Bhardwaj) was the one who piloted
> that resolution last year asking that all industries
> be regularised in Delhi in face of Supreme Court
> Order
> - which comes up on Oct 7 as first anniversary of
> Delhi Govt's wilful contempt of said Order. Jolly
> incidentally is similarly asking for regularisation
> all slums. How Shielaji and Ghulam Azad (who seems
> to
> be strangely reluctant to proceed to J&K as dutiful
> foot soldier) counter these migratory birds who have
> flocked together is a story to watch out for.
>
> Sarbajit
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
professions at large are not involved in GATS
decisions, nor in making any assessment of trend. plan
revisions countrywide seem to have seen less (esp
young) professional involvement this time and global
pre-occupations might be a factor. I havent seen the
tehelka list. does it distinguish between assets and
interests of baba-log that has decision-takers wrapped
around baby-finger?
re delhi assembly: industries, slums, hawkers,
schools, bijli-paani are all steady on their drift;
anil-n-mukesh harsh-n-jolly ghulam-n-begum are all
wanting the same and i think their histrionics are not
worth watching. the Bills are, but in the obfuscation
of legislature and theatre those are not being
discussed. like GATS is not being discussed.
- gita
--- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Gita,
>
> What is the purpose of this post? That is other than
> psuedo-KGB disinformation harking back to his
> Grandmother's days - which IS so much in the news
> nowadays.
>
> In any case, Rahul's assets are listed out in the
> latest Tehelka.
>
> Surely you are not implying that if anyone avails
> drawing and drafting services from Rahul's company -
> they will bag all these big projects?
>
> Perhaps we should focus closer to home, how all
> these
> rogue Congress MLA's of Delhi are alleging
> /rumouring
> from the rooftops that Shiela-ji has taken 300
> crores
> from the DISCOMs .. 200 crores of which went to you
> know who. Did you know that Mukesh Sharma was
> ejected
> by Marshals from the House yesterday BEFORE Vijay
> Jolly with all his "blackshirts" .. I find
> (incredibly) their fashion sense 2B sartorially and
> politically correct.
>
> Incidentally Mukesh Sharma (along with neophyte
> sidekick MLA Anil Bhardwaj) was the one who piloted
> that resolution last year asking that all industries
> be regularised in Delhi in face of Supreme Court
> Order
> - which comes up on Oct 7 as first anniversary of
> Delhi Govt's wilful contempt of said Order. Jolly
> incidentally is similarly asking for regularisation
> all slums. How Shielaji and Ghulam Azad (who seems
> to
> be strangely reluctant to proceed to J&K as dutiful
> foot soldier) counter these migratory birds who have
> flocked together is a story to watch out for.
>
> Sarbajit
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com