Well put poonam,
1)Are we allowed to take recording devices with us
into the proceedings?
2) From what sanjha manch is upto - also story in
today's Economic Times (Left calls for law to stop
slum demolition) - this matter is going to be fought
on constitutional grounds.
3) With Delhi HC itself calling for wholesale
implementation of Mixed Land Use (today's newspapers),
the game is well and truly afoot.
4) With the 74th Amendment dealing with
Municipalities, it seems Sanjha Manch wants DDA to be
abolished / merged with MCD.
http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend74.htm
5) How sure are we of Rule 9, and is it still in
force, was it ever in force, has it been modified, can
it be superceded / over-ridden? In this context, if we
recall my prawn malai posts, nobody could then show me
a law which a public servant was breaking - Here in
Rule 9 we have a perfect example of a law being broken
- of public servants not dealing with the property
(documents) we have entrusted to them to be dealt with
as per said law - so as to dishonestly cause wrongful
gain and loss (of property - LOTS of property) to
various persons. Time for a little notice,
6) Gita, in a previous post, had asked "is DDA above
RTI"? Time will tell - we dont have time - given 3
months we would have the answer - Rule 9 encapsulates
every ingredient of Article 19.
7) I would like to coordinate with Gita about notices
which Rajinder, Nizamuddin, Ashok etc ought to quickly
put in concerning Rule 9 and their denial of Rights
thereunder.
8) The Hindu story reveals why Sanjha munch is wary of
DMP2021 - their slum vote banks are being directly
targeted by the new proposals - which is why they want
to stall DMP2021 - or expand their role. Also they are
hand in glove with DDA which has already planned to
hold these public hearings zone wise all over Delhi.
9) Will anyone clarify for me: A.K.Jain is on the
Enquiry Board, he is also the Secretary of this Board?
Since he has signed the Land Use plan, and since he
has also signed the draft Zonal Plan (part) for Zone K
(not yet passed) - how can he sit on any board which
will hear my objns for dwarka.? How can VC sit on said
board when as member of Supreme Court monitoring
Committee in Industries judgement - I am complaining
about his failure / contempt to get directions of SC
fulfilled?
10) Violation of Fundamental Rights, Denial of Natural
Justice during proceedings, Vires of Laws - what are
we waiting for???
Sarbajit
--- poonam prakash
<pprakash.spafaculty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just to add to Gita's report on yesterday's meeting;
>
> This was the the fifth board meeting and first
> 'public hearing'. Order of
> the invitees was neither as per the registration nor
> the objection reference
> number so ITPI and PHDCCI and heritage committee
> took almost all the time
> before tea.
>
> Issue of illegality was raised by no one else before
> Gita's turn so let me
> narrate it as I remember it happened:
>
> Gita: I would like to be introduced to the members
> of the Board
> VC: We introduced ourselves in the morning
> Gita: I am being heard now so I would like to know
> (There were seven people sitting on the dais as
> mentioned earlier)
> VC (looking around): well, I am the chairman, Mr.
> Gurmukhi from the TCPO and
> Mr. Jain (commissioner planning).
> Gita: You need three members for the enquiry
> VC/ Comm.: We are three members
> Gita: Mr. Jain, you can not be on the board because
> the rule clearly
> provides member of either authority or the advisory
> council. if you assure
> me that this constitution is as per the rules I will
> go ahead
> (Silence)
> Comm(plng) We assure you. Please Go ahead.
> ! and so the hearing continued after GIta left.
> There were couple of others
> and by 12:30 it was open house, if any one wanted to
> say anything. Couple of
> people, including S.C.Gupta commented. S.C.Gupta
> mentioned that Urban Land
> Policy shoudl be in a separate document for which
> cabinet approval should be
> sought so as to implement the Plan.
>
> Besides K.T. Ravindran and Dinesh Mohan, various
> NGOs too were listed in
> after lunch session; Ashray Adhikar Abhiyan, Human
> Rights Law Network,
> Lokayan. Deapite this, Sajjha Munch continues to
> whine that there is no
> response, as per the report of The Hindu today:
>
> DDA's indifference to Master Plan criticised
>
> Staff Reporter
>
>
> With Delhi Development Authority not giving any
> acknowledgment or public
> response on whether and how it would treat over
> 20,000 objections filed on
> the draft Master Plan of Delhi 2021 by concerned
> citizens and groups, an
> alliance of voluntary organisations, Sanjha Manch,
> has charged the Authority
> with seriously undermining the issue of public
> participation, mandated even
> by the 74th Constitutional Amendment, and having
> only its own officials in a
> committee constituted for reviewing the objections.
>
>
>
http://www.hindu.com/2005/10/04/stories/2005100413540400.htm
>
> > > > > > An illegal Board has started today illegal
> > > > > NGO-style
> > > > > > hearings at PHD House and
> VPSingh/Sajha-Munch,
> > > > who
> > > > > > have made illegal demand for their nominee
> to be
> > > > > on
> > > > > > Board, plan to protest bureaucratic-style
> > > > > > functioning
> > > > > > outside DDA Vikas Sadan. we are trapped
> between
> > > > > two
> > > > > > illegal choices. we know we have been
> trapped.
> > > > > what
> > > > > > will we do now? *now*. the endgame has
> begun.
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > > > Do please browse the urls in this post.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/+/MPISG-Media/archive/msg00575.shtml
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________
> > > > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > > > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/118 -
> Release Date: 10/3/05
> >
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/118 -
> Release Date: 10/3/05
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
1)Are we allowed to take recording devices with us
into the proceedings?
2) From what sanjha manch is upto - also story in
today's Economic Times (Left calls for law to stop
slum demolition) - this matter is going to be fought
on constitutional grounds.
3) With Delhi HC itself calling for wholesale
implementation of Mixed Land Use (today's newspapers),
the game is well and truly afoot.
4) With the 74th Amendment dealing with
Municipalities, it seems Sanjha Manch wants DDA to be
abolished / merged with MCD.
http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend74.htm
5) How sure are we of Rule 9, and is it still in
force, was it ever in force, has it been modified, can
it be superceded / over-ridden? In this context, if we
recall my prawn malai posts, nobody could then show me
a law which a public servant was breaking - Here in
Rule 9 we have a perfect example of a law being broken
- of public servants not dealing with the property
(documents) we have entrusted to them to be dealt with
as per said law - so as to dishonestly cause wrongful
gain and loss (of property - LOTS of property) to
various persons. Time for a little notice,
6) Gita, in a previous post, had asked "is DDA above
RTI"? Time will tell - we dont have time - given 3
months we would have the answer - Rule 9 encapsulates
every ingredient of Article 19.
7) I would like to coordinate with Gita about notices
which Rajinder, Nizamuddin, Ashok etc ought to quickly
put in concerning Rule 9 and their denial of Rights
thereunder.
8) The Hindu story reveals why Sanjha munch is wary of
DMP2021 - their slum vote banks are being directly
targeted by the new proposals - which is why they want
to stall DMP2021 - or expand their role. Also they are
hand in glove with DDA which has already planned to
hold these public hearings zone wise all over Delhi.
9) Will anyone clarify for me: A.K.Jain is on the
Enquiry Board, he is also the Secretary of this Board?
Since he has signed the Land Use plan, and since he
has also signed the draft Zonal Plan (part) for Zone K
(not yet passed) - how can he sit on any board which
will hear my objns for dwarka.? How can VC sit on said
board when as member of Supreme Court monitoring
Committee in Industries judgement - I am complaining
about his failure / contempt to get directions of SC
fulfilled?
10) Violation of Fundamental Rights, Denial of Natural
Justice during proceedings, Vires of Laws - what are
we waiting for???
Sarbajit
--- poonam prakash
<pprakash.spafaculty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just to add to Gita's report on yesterday's meeting;
>
> This was the the fifth board meeting and first
> 'public hearing'. Order of
> the invitees was neither as per the registration nor
> the objection reference
> number so ITPI and PHDCCI and heritage committee
> took almost all the time
> before tea.
>
> Issue of illegality was raised by no one else before
> Gita's turn so let me
> narrate it as I remember it happened:
>
> Gita: I would like to be introduced to the members
> of the Board
> VC: We introduced ourselves in the morning
> Gita: I am being heard now so I would like to know
> (There were seven people sitting on the dais as
> mentioned earlier)
> VC (looking around): well, I am the chairman, Mr.
> Gurmukhi from the TCPO and
> Mr. Jain (commissioner planning).
> Gita: You need three members for the enquiry
> VC/ Comm.: We are three members
> Gita: Mr. Jain, you can not be on the board because
> the rule clearly
> provides member of either authority or the advisory
> council. if you assure
> me that this constitution is as per the rules I will
> go ahead
> (Silence)
> Comm(plng) We assure you. Please Go ahead.
> ! and so the hearing continued after GIta left.
> There were couple of others
> and by 12:30 it was open house, if any one wanted to
> say anything. Couple of
> people, including S.C.Gupta commented. S.C.Gupta
> mentioned that Urban Land
> Policy shoudl be in a separate document for which
> cabinet approval should be
> sought so as to implement the Plan.
>
> Besides K.T. Ravindran and Dinesh Mohan, various
> NGOs too were listed in
> after lunch session; Ashray Adhikar Abhiyan, Human
> Rights Law Network,
> Lokayan. Deapite this, Sajjha Munch continues to
> whine that there is no
> response, as per the report of The Hindu today:
>
> DDA's indifference to Master Plan criticised
>
> Staff Reporter
>
>
> With Delhi Development Authority not giving any
> acknowledgment or public
> response on whether and how it would treat over
> 20,000 objections filed on
> the draft Master Plan of Delhi 2021 by concerned
> citizens and groups, an
> alliance of voluntary organisations, Sanjha Manch,
> has charged the Authority
> with seriously undermining the issue of public
> participation, mandated even
> by the 74th Constitutional Amendment, and having
> only its own officials in a
> committee constituted for reviewing the objections.
>
>
>
http://www.hindu.com/2005/10/04/stories/2005100413540400.htm
>
> > > > > > An illegal Board has started today illegal
> > > > > NGO-style
> > > > > > hearings at PHD House and
> VPSingh/Sajha-Munch,
> > > > who
> > > > > > have made illegal demand for their nominee
> to be
> > > > > on
> > > > > > Board, plan to protest bureaucratic-style
> > > > > > functioning
> > > > > > outside DDA Vikas Sadan. we are trapped
> between
> > > > > two
> > > > > > illegal choices. we know we have been
> trapped.
> > > > > what
> > > > > > will we do now? *now*. the endgame has
> begun.
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > > > Do please browse the urls in this post.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/+/MPISG-Media/archive/msg00575.shtml
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________
> > > > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> > > > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > > > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/118 -
> Release Date: 10/3/05
> >
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/118 -
> Release Date: 10/3/05
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com