> Architexturez. wrote:
>> | has the Urban Renewal Mission a website? we gotta index
>> | this for sure!
>>
>> The mission will consist of two submissions: one on urban infrastructure
>> and governance and the other on basic services to the urban poor.
poor sub: http://muepa.nic.in/programs/index2.htm
infra sub: http://urbanindia.nic.in/moud/programme/ud/main.htm
tender: http://urbanindia.nic.in/moud/what%27snew/main.htm
> | ahmedabad gets about 700 crore per year, for example. CEPT University
> | consultancy has far in excess of that on board right now. many
> | people think one lakh crore is too paltry a bribe to bow to
> | central government pessures.
> |
> | India is a rich country, beware of the pro-poor, eco-friendly
> | people telling you otherwise.
>
> Death knell for urban development schemes
> E JAYASHREE KURUP
> Posted online: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 at 0424 hours IST
> So far no state has come forward with proposals seeking Central
> assistance under the Rs 50,000 crore Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban
> Renewal Mission (JNNURM) in accordance with the guidelines after its
> high profile launch by the Prime Minister on December 3.
> http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=111469
>
(also indore-bhopal post later) is no media hysteria about states not
marching forth, but sales-pitch about states have committed to reform by
signing MoAs since 500 cr URIF of 2003:
http://muepa.nic.in/w_new/urifII.htm
In GATS our planning regulation is headed for WTO dispute resolution
system. If state or local law is successfully challenged as trade barrier
GoI will take steps to ensure state or local compliance. In that will help
these MoAs to do (with or w/o MoUD-prescribed firms / tool-kits) CDPs made
out of visions of Narayan Murthys and E Sreedharans, area-specific byelaws
by/for participatory local area planning and self-sanctioned architecture
and other things being made hot-hip-n-happening with 100000 cr promo
frenzy.
mega-businesses might have to lobby other governments to challenge (less
socialist) land use policies in US or EU, here we are doing voluntary
demolition of our laws (and capital absurdities like demolishing by court
infused vigour violations of the building-byelaws that we are reforming,
in name of upholding the master plan that we are demolishing) and
self-help installation of USAID-made GATS-enabling substitute regime: in
mission-mode.
>> | has the Urban Renewal Mission a website? we gotta index
>> | this for sure!
>>
>> The mission will consist of two submissions: one on urban infrastructure
>> and governance and the other on basic services to the urban poor.
poor sub: http://muepa.nic.in/programs/index2.htm
infra sub: http://urbanindia.nic.in/moud/programme/ud/main.htm
tender: http://urbanindia.nic.in/moud/what%27snew/main.htm
> | ahmedabad gets about 700 crore per year, for example. CEPT University
> | consultancy has far in excess of that on board right now. many
> | people think one lakh crore is too paltry a bribe to bow to
> | central government pessures.
> |
> | India is a rich country, beware of the pro-poor, eco-friendly
> | people telling you otherwise.
>
> Death knell for urban development schemes
> E JAYASHREE KURUP
> Posted online: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 at 0424 hours IST
> So far no state has come forward with proposals seeking Central
> assistance under the Rs 50,000 crore Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban
> Renewal Mission (JNNURM) in accordance with the guidelines after its
> high profile launch by the Prime Minister on December 3.
> http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=111469
>
(also indore-bhopal post later) is no media hysteria about states not
marching forth, but sales-pitch about states have committed to reform by
signing MoAs since 500 cr URIF of 2003:
http://muepa.nic.in/w_new/urifII.htm
In GATS our planning regulation is headed for WTO dispute resolution
system. If state or local law is successfully challenged as trade barrier
GoI will take steps to ensure state or local compliance. In that will help
these MoAs to do (with or w/o MoUD-prescribed firms / tool-kits) CDPs made
out of visions of Narayan Murthys and E Sreedharans, area-specific byelaws
by/for participatory local area planning and self-sanctioned architecture
and other things being made hot-hip-n-happening with 100000 cr promo
frenzy.
mega-businesses might have to lobby other governments to challenge (less
socialist) land use policies in US or EU, here we are doing voluntary
demolition of our laws (and capital absurdities like demolishing by court
infused vigour violations of the building-byelaws that we are reforming,
in name of upholding the master plan that we are demolishing) and
self-help installation of USAID-made GATS-enabling substitute regime: in
mission-mode.