That story I mentioned - John Clute's _Appleseed_ -
seems to offer even more angles than expected. There,
the ships soar upon lines oflight, sensing & imaging,
orbiting gallactic center, returning to the margins to
nest at last, twisting inward to merge the latest
immanence with the transcendent Predecessor archives.
Think wasp and orchid.. (Warning: stay out of the
archives -- they hide bull-headed minitours of
frustration -- or leave Ariadne threads for escape? ;)
Sorry, venusia, like PM suggests, I too have multiple
productive personalities and must often "WORK at
something that is not cognate with my most real
interests". I cannot help with graphics or animations
other than attempts to make disparate texts, sometimes
images and personas, copulate occasionally... perhaps
you can do animation by offering characters, scenes,
situations, objects to be impromptully reconfigured
using weblogging techniques (knowing nothing much
about these)? Recent 11 years of cartoon watching with
daughter - laughing at how radically these prevert the
social structures, eg, Rug Rats so much more clever
than their parents (a favorite cartoon was _Prometheus
& Bob_ - see http://www.swt.edu/~mb35/pnb/ ) - is not
experience enough...
With all due gravity, still crashing from a 4-day
flight from work, but back, Mark
--- avuydanbqrth gdhmndg
<hasardous_CUNT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> summarizes: "it is the present that passes that
> defines the actual; the virtual is defined by the
> past that conserves itself". Thus, the
transcendental
> field being, I suspect, where all these cartoons
come
> toplay..
>
> which cartoons: bug bunny, mickey. are you
> interested by cartoons.
>
> jean luc godard said it was a nice place of the
> cinema industry, where there is potential for
> creativity and thinking.
>
> why is he never doing some then. deleuze talks about
> cartoon in cinema2, but didnot say interesting
> thing, relevant to my interests it means. its true
> most of the way cartoonist work, is like bd,
> comics in your language, you work with outline which
> then you fill with homogenous colour, dullness.
>
> cartoon, its nice for expereminenting with otherwise
> impossible movements. we suffer a lot from the kind
> of realism they have everywhere in the arts. realism
> in arts is like a kind of molarity, leaning much on
> dualities, such as the frame, the outline, the
> objects.
>
> speaking of the texts where deleuze has been
> critizing the dullness of object-subject relation,
> cartoon is much imbed in it these days.
> what do you think?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
seems to offer even more angles than expected. There,
the ships soar upon lines oflight, sensing & imaging,
orbiting gallactic center, returning to the margins to
nest at last, twisting inward to merge the latest
immanence with the transcendent Predecessor archives.
Think wasp and orchid.. (Warning: stay out of the
archives -- they hide bull-headed minitours of
frustration -- or leave Ariadne threads for escape? ;)
Sorry, venusia, like PM suggests, I too have multiple
productive personalities and must often "WORK at
something that is not cognate with my most real
interests". I cannot help with graphics or animations
other than attempts to make disparate texts, sometimes
images and personas, copulate occasionally... perhaps
you can do animation by offering characters, scenes,
situations, objects to be impromptully reconfigured
using weblogging techniques (knowing nothing much
about these)? Recent 11 years of cartoon watching with
daughter - laughing at how radically these prevert the
social structures, eg, Rug Rats so much more clever
than their parents (a favorite cartoon was _Prometheus
& Bob_ - see http://www.swt.edu/~mb35/pnb/ ) - is not
experience enough...
With all due gravity, still crashing from a 4-day
flight from work, but back, Mark
--- avuydanbqrth gdhmndg
<hasardous_CUNT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> summarizes: "it is the present that passes that
> defines the actual; the virtual is defined by the
> past that conserves itself". Thus, the
transcendental
> field being, I suspect, where all these cartoons
come
> toplay..
>
> which cartoons: bug bunny, mickey. are you
> interested by cartoons.
>
> jean luc godard said it was a nice place of the
> cinema industry, where there is potential for
> creativity and thinking.
>
> why is he never doing some then. deleuze talks about
> cartoon in cinema2, but didnot say interesting
> thing, relevant to my interests it means. its true
> most of the way cartoonist work, is like bd,
> comics in your language, you work with outline which
> then you fill with homogenous colour, dullness.
>
> cartoon, its nice for expereminenting with otherwise
> impossible movements. we suffer a lot from the kind
> of realism they have everywhere in the arts. realism
> in arts is like a kind of molarity, leaning much on
> dualities, such as the frame, the outline, the
> objects.
>
> speaking of the texts where deleuze has been
> critizing the dullness of object-subject relation,
> cartoon is much imbed in it these days.
> what do you think?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com