Ray gets artistic in sentencing readers to this rhetoric.
> The problem with the derrida list is the ultra-focus.
Is this a question of refinement or one of penetrating X(ray)
generations of past your eyes flows?
> My interest is to read Derrida with designers.
Is this comm artists, come-meatyians or street signers you refer?
> I do agree that reading Derrida might tend to gel our comments into an
> assemblage as opposed to flames flying in independent directions.
This busted me up. How might these assemblages and John Young's net
provider name "pipeline" relate to sewers, networks, rat catchers and
Rocky's Horrible Picture show'n tell us about huts, huh? Ghos' fuguer.
> Our witing is already rather derridasque - given that it starts and stops
> much like a conversation held in segments.
Trollop doll y'up.
> The problem with the derrida list is the ultra-focus.
Is this a question of refinement or one of penetrating X(ray)
generations of past your eyes flows?
> My interest is to read Derrida with designers.
Is this comm artists, come-meatyians or street signers you refer?
> I do agree that reading Derrida might tend to gel our comments into an
> assemblage as opposed to flames flying in independent directions.
This busted me up. How might these assemblages and John Young's net
provider name "pipeline" relate to sewers, networks, rat catchers and
Rocky's Horrible Picture show'n tell us about huts, huh? Ghos' fuguer.
> Our witing is already rather derridasque - given that it starts and stops
> much like a conversation held in segments.
Trollop doll y'up.