You should know that this issue has come up before and that Heideggerians
are notorious for burying this issue. My experience is that there is a
tendency on this list to ignore these posts. So, if you are ignored, know
that the arrow has nonetheless hit its mark!
At 05:31 AM 5/22/96 -2400, you wrote:
>The exchange re Husser/Heiddegger warrants some clarification.
>H was a Nazi,that is indisputable.That makes me feel quite
>uncomfortable.
>Name
> one other Nazi who is studied seriously today.Now to state that the
>business of the man has nothing to do with his work is -a
>position.
>I would suggest that a philosopher in the service of the Reich
>has some explaining to do.Is ontology so divorced from history?
>
>Wilton Rodger
>
>
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
are notorious for burying this issue. My experience is that there is a
tendency on this list to ignore these posts. So, if you are ignored, know
that the arrow has nonetheless hit its mark!
At 05:31 AM 5/22/96 -2400, you wrote:
>The exchange re Husser/Heiddegger warrants some clarification.
>H was a Nazi,that is indisputable.That makes me feel quite
>uncomfortable.
>Name
> one other Nazi who is studied seriously today.Now to state that the
>business of the man has nothing to do with his work is -a
>position.
>I would suggest that a philosopher in the service of the Reich
>has some explaining to do.Is ontology so divorced from history?
>
>Wilton Rodger
>
>
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---