Re: Primacy of poetry/language/myth

>Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1996 12:11:23 +1200
>From: crickey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (chris rickey)
>Subject: Re: Primacy of poetry/language/myth

>
> Since the gods come to presence only in poetry or the work of art, what we are
>also supposed to remember is that there was a time when art still could institute new sayings of
>being, that there was a possibility of new beginnings founded by poets, in other words, how being
>comes to presence. This second point led to Heidegger's later obsession with Hegel's pronouncement
>that art was dead and had lost its place in our epoch of being. Holderlin pointed to the
>possibility that Hegel was wrong, and that the lightning flash of being which illuminates the
>shining of the gods is still possible.

Sorry, are you saying that poetry and works of art are two different things?
When did HEGEL say art was dead rather, as I had thought, that art was in a state of dissolution,
being only a stage?
Further, have you not thought that the flighht of the gods, the darkening etc, is in turn necessary
for truth as aletheia, for truth is not something continually held on to, at least as i saw it...
Erik Champion



--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---


Partial thread listing: