RE: grave thots on a great hack


do we not desire the secure days of monks and monasteries where the
legends have it the good monk does not die until granted permission by
his superior... and now we're all supposed to be benedictines in thrall
to the medical technology delivery system industry and its speedy
R&D/Mkt'g/pharmo-fashion dept. that gives the glamour to the similitude
of my ownmost potentiality for being...

oblivion creeps further along inside this side, like fumes from under
the door.

somewhere brooding here is the existentiale of stupidity...
the one heidegger left secret or erased in the first draft, following
plato or at least aristotle.

that will to will does not bring stupidity up to philosophy, but rather...

how can we not be enmeshed in the transcendental posture of stupidity
aka gestell?


Bakker, R.B.M. de wrote on 6/11/04, 6:10 AM:

> Bob, Henry,
>
> Isn't he the 'living' proof of the inability to die?
>
> Being instaendig cautious towards the constant terror
> of biologistic fraud, sooner or later the possibility
> might present itself to one, that death and sickness are
> maybe not just biological happenings.
>
> And that the machenschaftliche fear of Altzheimer has more
> to do with Angst and its forgetting, than with the DNA lottery
> of god Man.
>
> But then, the aggravating dementia and dementi in the rational
> zoo, something different as well from what is normally thought.
> Another finger pointing at the living dead.
>
> rene
>
> cave canem



--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

Replies
RE: grave thots on a great hack, Bakker, R.B.M. de
Partial thread listing: