The undermining of a subjectivity that successfully filters humane humanity,
by appealing to the feeling of security and by continually lying re "terrorism",
is therefore necessary, because after Guatemala and Vietnam comes Iraq, and after
Iraq will come Iran or Kurdistan - it will never stop, that's what Anthony
called 'progress'. All opposition to torture seems to have led only to a greater
acceptance. Which is necessary because of the information era, in which less can
be kept hidden, but more manipulated.
So the question seems unavoidable: why is that? And i repeat that the only possible
way out is questioning subjectivity. Not the BT way, which has a fatal amount of
subjectivity itself,
Fatal is Heidegger's word, not mine.
SuZ, p 60, par. 13:
"Subject and object don't align with Dasein and world."
note: Indeed not! So little, that by juxtaposition also the
disclaimer is fatal.
hope this is clear. it's the same as with the 'pernicious' approach
of plain ontological distinction. One thinks one is clever, while
one is just making murderous statements.
[...] but by taking BT as start of the road, going through to H2.
And that only makes sense when the problem of "Heidegger the Nazi" is solved, which
is only a problem of current philosophy with itself.
SuZ, 40/41 beginning par. 9: The theme of the analytics of Dasein.
"The Being, of which the analysis is to be done, are we [note: je 'ich'] ourselves.
The Being of this being is each time MINE (je MEINES) In the Being of this being,
this (being) self comports/relates to its Being." [note: But this is historical
Being-in-the-world, geschichtliches in-der-Welt-sein]
Geschichtliches Dasein: Dasein is never always the same, it is 'je' different.
Since Descartes beings are objects. Before not. So, no matter how much historical
correctness one is able of establishing, in fact one has not engaged with historical
Dasein at all.
It is Descartes who engaged, through a new determination of the subject notion!
The same notion that after him becomes universal (Leibniz) and unconditional
(Hegel, Nietzsche), and now is the hidden ground (sub-ject) of meaninglessness
(wtw).
rdb
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
by appealing to the feeling of security and by continually lying re "terrorism",
is therefore necessary, because after Guatemala and Vietnam comes Iraq, and after
Iraq will come Iran or Kurdistan - it will never stop, that's what Anthony
called 'progress'. All opposition to torture seems to have led only to a greater
acceptance. Which is necessary because of the information era, in which less can
be kept hidden, but more manipulated.
So the question seems unavoidable: why is that? And i repeat that the only possible
way out is questioning subjectivity. Not the BT way, which has a fatal amount of
subjectivity itself,
Fatal is Heidegger's word, not mine.
SuZ, p 60, par. 13:
"Subject and object don't align with Dasein and world."
note: Indeed not! So little, that by juxtaposition also the
disclaimer is fatal.
hope this is clear. it's the same as with the 'pernicious' approach
of plain ontological distinction. One thinks one is clever, while
one is just making murderous statements.
[...] but by taking BT as start of the road, going through to H2.
And that only makes sense when the problem of "Heidegger the Nazi" is solved, which
is only a problem of current philosophy with itself.
SuZ, 40/41 beginning par. 9: The theme of the analytics of Dasein.
"The Being, of which the analysis is to be done, are we [note: je 'ich'] ourselves.
The Being of this being is each time MINE (je MEINES) In the Being of this being,
this (being) self comports/relates to its Being." [note: But this is historical
Being-in-the-world, geschichtliches in-der-Welt-sein]
Geschichtliches Dasein: Dasein is never always the same, it is 'je' different.
Since Descartes beings are objects. Before not. So, no matter how much historical
correctness one is able of establishing, in fact one has not engaged with historical
Dasein at all.
It is Descartes who engaged, through a new determination of the subject notion!
The same notion that after him becomes universal (Leibniz) and unconditional
(Hegel, Nietzsche), and now is the hidden ground (sub-ject) of meaninglessness
(wtw).
rdb
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---