> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
> heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of michaelP
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 6:17 AM
> To: heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: electronique sillicide bombardmentalities
>
> >From: "Tudor Georgescu" <tgeorgescu@xxxxxxx>
> >To: <heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: RE: electronique sillicide bombardmentalities
> >Date: Sun, Jul 25, 2004, 11:42 am
> >
> Jud to mP:
> >> I have however seen photographs of it recorded upon an optical
> instrument
> >> called a camera. As to "God" and its lay version: "Being" I have
> never
> >> actually seen any photographs or evidence that they exist - perhaps
> you
> >> have?
>
> Tude to Jud:
> > Well, I would say you are almost always seeing Being (that fact that at
> > least some beings are). Even when you dream you see that some virtual
> > entities/energies/impressions are, but you don't realize it. Awake!
>
> mP to both:
> One can see and photograph visible beings; one can hear and record audible
> beings; etc; but one can not see or hear being since it is not a being;
> one
> can think being though...
Howdy mP,
Can you say more about "thinking being?" ...that is, can you please
distinguish "thinking being?"
TIA,
BobG
>
> ...and for the same reason, being is not a lay or any other version of god
> since god is a being and being is not a being (and so can not be any
> version
> or model or example etc of a being)... think again mes amis!
>
> regards
>
> michaelP
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---