In a message dated 08/10/2004 23:21:28 GMT Standard Time,
a03jamga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes
He who hasn't even got the guts to sign his name writes:
...Is that so? What I've found most fascinating in my attempt to explore
Heidegger
through this mailing list is how much time is given towards, not simply
subjects that I find irrelevant, but subjects that have been KILLED long
ago. Wasn't there talk recently about poking at corpses?
Jud:
The subject of Heidegger being a raving loony Nazi may have been *KILLED*
in the minds of the usual ragbag of apologist and immature trannie
dickheads
who are slow to grasp the implications of Heidegger's evil persona, but there
remain others who are not that stupid.
He who hasn't even got the guts to sign his name continues:
It seems that Jud finds an audience here because no where else, except
among dumbasses flipping through campy history channels, can tolerate the
merry-go-round about the injustices begone during WWII, by Heidegger, by
Traditions, by Truth, by XXX.
Jud:
No doubt you will be referring to the deaths of American and Allied troops
and sundry civilians and innocent Iraqis in the same way
when they are aired on the *campy history channels* in a few years time —
you zit-infested zombie?
He who hasn't even got the guts to sign his name continues:
Jud, your ad hominem tirades are gimpy. Also in relation to "BUT I DON'T
DISLIKE OR HATE THEM BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE OR NATIONALITY." Perhaps you'd
inform us, as so we may understand your duty, why excatly hating based on
race or nationality is wrong?
Jud:
Because we are not all moronic trannie disgraces to your country like you.
Yes, [yawn] It is ALWAYS the same old trannies like you that pop up when it
comes to defending hate.
He who hasn't even got the guts to sign his name continues:
You know what? Heidegger was dipshit. Who cares? I'm sure I can find a
thousand seemingly justified reasons for why you are inferior to me, but
why would I bother? Why do you bother with your duty (which I doubt is
anything but smokescreen for avoiding responsibility)?
Jud:
I NEVER avoid responsibility, I ALWAYS *bother,* particularly when it calls
for responding
to half-educated ass-holes like you. So if you have come here looking for a
response to your ad hom meconium — you've found your man.
Surface dipshits like you are incapable of understanding that in matters
literary and philosophical the biography of the author
is very helpful in the hermenuetical process. Or are you still stuck in a
bonehead postmodernist time-warp,
where *only the words exist* and the originator is of no interest?
He who hasn't even got the guts to sign his name continues:
Why spend so much time on this when plane ticket can be bought? You guys
can meet up and beat the shit out of one another. That may resolve all the
resentment here.
Jud:
You mean sort it out the religious or trannie way like they have done for
thousands of years?
You mean that physical rather than verbal combat is superior? You think just
like the trannie thug you are.
Jud
Personal Website:
_http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/index.htm_
(http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/index.htm)
E-mail Discussion List:
nominalism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed ---
This message may have contained attachments which were removed.
Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---