renerecently:
> Trawny explains in a short note Heidegger's word of
> an incubation of the principle of reason, lasting
> more than 2000 years.
rene, help me: do you mean here the leibnitzean nothing happens without a
reason (ground)? every thing has a be-cause? only nothing happens with out a
reason...? no-thing IS without reason (ground)? Is this the leap that looks
back in the change of tone from beings (nothing is without reason) to be-ing
(nothing IS without reason)? One heck of a dizzying stimmung!
Heidegger:
"Sein und Grund: das Selbe. Sein: der Ab-grund"
{be-ing and reason: the same. Be-ing: the abyss}
but if be-ing (the groundless, the abyssal) [is] the same as reason (the
ground that grounds beings) then be-ing is the groundless grounding; wow!
Is this incubation, the deferred/differed sending of be-ing, the all ways
coming never present?
Sounds like a bachian fugue to me...
regards
michaelP
Michael Pennamacoor
Abgrundrisse
tel: 01304 617626
fax: 0870 163 8935
e: michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.abgrundrisse.net
http://www.cafeshops.com/Abgrundrisse
http://michael-pennamacoor.fotopic.net
>
> 'Incubation' suggests a virus, a disease. To Juenger
> Heidegger speaks of 'the cancer'. Those following
> Heidegger's critics of Juenger -namely that he
> IDENTIFIES himself with power/work - maybe already
> felt reservation. And indeed: the volume 'Zu Juenger'
> ed. by Trawny' offer hundreds of pages Juenger-study,
> wherein Juenger is praised as the only real follower
> of Nietzsche, and at the same time the harshest
> criticism. (this 'at the same time' is the big
> obstacle for nowadays intelligence)
>
> In The principle of reason, i believe near the end,
> Heidegger mentions a 'temple sleep'. Now Trawny
> gave the clue to me: 'incubare' is originally:
> laying down and sleeping in a temple to let the
> god come closer.
>
> The main point of Princ. of reason is the change of tone.
> Without the change, both phases, for themselves, are
> concrete, stone. Everything depends on hearing how the
> tone of metaphysics, from Plato, via Cicero, to Descartes
> and Leibniz, gets more and more urging. Leibniz is very
> close, there's an unrest in his late letters, Heidegger
> writes.
>
> We cannot change the innumerable notes, but we can work
> towards hearing the change of tone, the moment of modulation.
> This moment is sudden and, like the passage of a god, can be
> missed, individually and/or by all. That's why we should sleep
> with the principle of demanded ground, that might turn out to
> be sthing very different from the principle of Leibniz' meta-
> physics, and hear a different tone in its now coercing character.
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
> Trawny explains in a short note Heidegger's word of
> an incubation of the principle of reason, lasting
> more than 2000 years.
rene, help me: do you mean here the leibnitzean nothing happens without a
reason (ground)? every thing has a be-cause? only nothing happens with out a
reason...? no-thing IS without reason (ground)? Is this the leap that looks
back in the change of tone from beings (nothing is without reason) to be-ing
(nothing IS without reason)? One heck of a dizzying stimmung!
Heidegger:
"Sein und Grund: das Selbe. Sein: der Ab-grund"
{be-ing and reason: the same. Be-ing: the abyss}
but if be-ing (the groundless, the abyssal) [is] the same as reason (the
ground that grounds beings) then be-ing is the groundless grounding; wow!
Is this incubation, the deferred/differed sending of be-ing, the all ways
coming never present?
Sounds like a bachian fugue to me...
regards
michaelP
Michael Pennamacoor
Abgrundrisse
tel: 01304 617626
fax: 0870 163 8935
e: michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.abgrundrisse.net
http://www.cafeshops.com/Abgrundrisse
http://michael-pennamacoor.fotopic.net
>
> 'Incubation' suggests a virus, a disease. To Juenger
> Heidegger speaks of 'the cancer'. Those following
> Heidegger's critics of Juenger -namely that he
> IDENTIFIES himself with power/work - maybe already
> felt reservation. And indeed: the volume 'Zu Juenger'
> ed. by Trawny' offer hundreds of pages Juenger-study,
> wherein Juenger is praised as the only real follower
> of Nietzsche, and at the same time the harshest
> criticism. (this 'at the same time' is the big
> obstacle for nowadays intelligence)
>
> In The principle of reason, i believe near the end,
> Heidegger mentions a 'temple sleep'. Now Trawny
> gave the clue to me: 'incubare' is originally:
> laying down and sleeping in a temple to let the
> god come closer.
>
> The main point of Princ. of reason is the change of tone.
> Without the change, both phases, for themselves, are
> concrete, stone. Everything depends on hearing how the
> tone of metaphysics, from Plato, via Cicero, to Descartes
> and Leibniz, gets more and more urging. Leibniz is very
> close, there's an unrest in his late letters, Heidegger
> writes.
>
> We cannot change the innumerable notes, but we can work
> towards hearing the change of tone, the moment of modulation.
> This moment is sudden and, like the passage of a god, can be
> missed, individually and/or by all. That's why we should sleep
> with the principle of demanded ground, that might turn out to
> be sthing very different from the principle of Leibniz' meta-
> physics, and hear a different tone in its now coercing character.
>
>
> --- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---