>Kenneth, with the list still surviving in one form or another, then we have
>white-hope-rene available to curtly thrill us and perhaps inspire us to
>greater heights (no irony); I know I have a whole bunch of issues arising
>from his raps that I haven't had proper thinking time to respond to just
>now, but I shall (if the list continues). Some like ThatPete might prefer to
>go blogging, but I still love the possibilities inherent in conversing with
>a possible multitude of concerned others on and around heidegger, his
>thinking and works, and philosophy generally, and this list (whether waxing
>or waning) still provides that incomparable blessing.
>>
>> kenneth - - -
>
>highest regards
>
>michaelP
Well here on ramble at raw bolts and nuts level I assume the critical issue
is available hard drive space and a permanent place for it. Just checking
the size of my personal accumulated Heidegger incoming posts filtered
directly into my H box, there are about 40+ megabytes, this since jan of
99. These are in Eudora Client format, I think the actual spoon archive for
these same posts is probably much less as it uses plain text, tho there are
few small command programs that make it easy to move around
I agree your stepping in with what you've done so far saves our bacon and
gives us uninterrupted stream so it is the best possible interim solution
offered. Thanks!!
btw, i was once a subscriber to a yahoo group, the Townes VanZandt list,
archive access was easy and had no really nasty irritations like the ones
that ThatPete mentions, don't recall any irking ads -
regards
kenneth
x
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---