national policy for urban street venders
http://muepa.nic.in/policies/index2.htm(making
'officially' started in 2001, cabinet approval Jan
2004, UPA reiteration July 2004 onwards)
(engagements from different perspective since 2000
loosely chronicled in commerce section of mpisg on
AZPlan)
--- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Everyone (especially gita),
>
> re; My prev email on this subject.
>
> Just wish to clarify that :-
>
> 1) I have no objection to demarcated Hawking Spaces
> by
> Master Plan processes for non-polluting and non
> nuisance activities.
>
> 2) the "Structure Plan" (ho ho) must have adequate
> provisions for Hawkers alongside public streets.
>
> 3) "Pavements"and "sidewalks" may be classifiable as
> "easements", and hence not covered under 431 IPC.
>
> Sarbajit
>
>
> --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Wrong end of stick, Police Commissioner can stop
> > it
> > > under Delhi Police Act if he chooses to. REALLY,
> >
> >
> > ----
> >
> > As far as I know
> >
> > (a) Police normally cannot refuse force
> > requisitioned
> > by authorities. So it provided force to MCD to
> > relocate kabaadi bazaar to Pushta and to close
> > book-bazaar. (Both initiatives are unlawful in
> terms
> > of Delhi Master Plan and violative of national
> > policy
> > co-authored by Delhi Police and after providing
> > force
> > for them to MCD, Police permitted NGO dharna
> against
> > MCD. Our communications are primarily about this
> > anomaly).
> >
> > (b) Police can stop under its Act street vending
> > that
> > interferes with movement. Those powers should not
> /
> > arguably cannot be exercised, especially apropos
> > weekly markets, without first exercising
> > responsibilities for solutions under other
> statutory
> > regimes. (This is central to our communications,
> > intended also to counter any quick-fix requests
> for
> > use of Police Act).
> >
> > As stated, MCD bullying was suspended and we have
> > heard from Police. For the record, mpisg is not
> > engaging on this from plannerly perspective, but
> > from
> > ambit of national policy (come about at instance
> of
> > anti-planning types). Through 2001-2004 we have
> > pointed out conflicts between the policy and
> > statutory
> > regimes and have succeeded in having a few of
> those
> > ironed out, which gives us space to engage. By the
> > way, the duly adopted policy still calls for
> > amendments to the Police Act.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ____________________________________________________
> > Sell on Yahoo! Auctions ? no fees. Bid on great
> > items.
> > http://auctions.yahoo.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
http://muepa.nic.in/policies/index2.htm(making
'officially' started in 2001, cabinet approval Jan
2004, UPA reiteration July 2004 onwards)
(engagements from different perspective since 2000
loosely chronicled in commerce section of mpisg on
AZPlan)
--- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Everyone (especially gita),
>
> re; My prev email on this subject.
>
> Just wish to clarify that :-
>
> 1) I have no objection to demarcated Hawking Spaces
> by
> Master Plan processes for non-polluting and non
> nuisance activities.
>
> 2) the "Structure Plan" (ho ho) must have adequate
> provisions for Hawkers alongside public streets.
>
> 3) "Pavements"and "sidewalks" may be classifiable as
> "easements", and hence not covered under 431 IPC.
>
> Sarbajit
>
>
> --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Wrong end of stick, Police Commissioner can stop
> > it
> > > under Delhi Police Act if he chooses to. REALLY,
> >
> >
> > ----
> >
> > As far as I know
> >
> > (a) Police normally cannot refuse force
> > requisitioned
> > by authorities. So it provided force to MCD to
> > relocate kabaadi bazaar to Pushta and to close
> > book-bazaar. (Both initiatives are unlawful in
> terms
> > of Delhi Master Plan and violative of national
> > policy
> > co-authored by Delhi Police and after providing
> > force
> > for them to MCD, Police permitted NGO dharna
> against
> > MCD. Our communications are primarily about this
> > anomaly).
> >
> > (b) Police can stop under its Act street vending
> > that
> > interferes with movement. Those powers should not
> /
> > arguably cannot be exercised, especially apropos
> > weekly markets, without first exercising
> > responsibilities for solutions under other
> statutory
> > regimes. (This is central to our communications,
> > intended also to counter any quick-fix requests
> for
> > use of Police Act).
> >
> > As stated, MCD bullying was suspended and we have
> > heard from Police. For the record, mpisg is not
> > engaging on this from plannerly perspective, but
> > from
> > ambit of national policy (come about at instance
> of
> > anti-planning types). Through 2001-2004 we have
> > pointed out conflicts between the policy and
> > statutory
> > regimes and have succeeded in having a few of
> those
> > ironed out, which gives us space to engage. By the
> > way, the duly adopted policy still calls for
> > amendments to the Police Act.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ____________________________________________________
> > Sell on Yahoo! Auctions ? no fees. Bid on great
> > items.
> > http://auctions.yahoo.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpisgmedia mailing list
> > mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> mpisgmedia mailing list
> mpisgmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://mail.architexturez.net/mailman/listinfo/mpisgmedia
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com