this IS endgame. when hearings are over dmp2021 will
become de-facto dmp regardless of any delay in
notification.
I think you see this as a game about DDA, other-side
king that we have to check-mate. I see it is a game
about DMP, king besides which DDA ought to have been
queen, and gnctd, mcd, ndmc, itpi, spa, duac, tcpo,
etc, the 2+ point pieces. all of them are somehow
reduced to pawns for the other side (made of those who
subvert equity and efficiency and safeguards /
guarantees and are found equally in Govt, NGO,
professions, business, politics, wherever). the game
can not be according to rules till our pieces are
reclaimed. we cannot break the board and walk away, it
is our board. we cannot drag *them* on to our turf,
they are standing on our turf.
for DDA I prefer s.41(3) to RTI (we need intervention
to heal not information to kill). for sanjhaNGOs (also
ITPI, PHDCC, etc, which are structurally same), RTI
would be very nice, but I have the impression they are
above it. They are not?
--- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Gita,
>
> Thanks for a very detailed post.
>
> We are still in middle game (chesswise) and NOT
> trapped. When the game is not played by the Rules -
> break the board, walk away and drag them onto your
> turf.
>
> 1) Writing long letters etc. may not work - there is
> already enough documentation to show engagement.
> It's
> time for telegrams (obtain certified copies by
> paying
> Rs. 3 extra) to Prez (as Central Government), short
> 1
> page leters to LG, AKJain(as secy Enquiry Board),
> then
> its time for the Real Monty.
>
> 2) Another route is also open (you wont like this
> one), you can file RTIs "now" under the new law.
> This
> saves 10 days. Here are the details - it would be
> interesting to see if DDA is prepared for the RTI
> onslaught. Asian Age had it today.
>
>
http://www.asianage.com/main.asp?layout=2&cat1=7&cat2=48&newsid=184492&RF=DefaultMain
>
> Here's another link (BETTER) to it since Asian Age
> link stpos working after 24 hours due to poor
> webdesign technology.
>
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cyberlaw-india/message/2147
>
> I am facing the same problem about procedural
> bypassing in my fight against the Information
> Technology Act 2005 amendments.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > An illegal Board has started today illegal
> NGO-style
> > hearings at PHD House and VPSingh/Sajha-Munch, who
> > have made illegal demand for their nominee to be
> on
> > Board, plan to protest bureaucratic-style
> > functioning
> > outside DDA Vikas Sadan. we are trapped between
> two
> > illegal choices. we know we have been trapped.
> what
> > will we do now? *now*. the endgame has begun.
...
> > Do please browse the urls in this post.
http://mail.architexturez.net/+/MPISG-Media/archive/msg00575.shtml
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
become de-facto dmp regardless of any delay in
notification.
I think you see this as a game about DDA, other-side
king that we have to check-mate. I see it is a game
about DMP, king besides which DDA ought to have been
queen, and gnctd, mcd, ndmc, itpi, spa, duac, tcpo,
etc, the 2+ point pieces. all of them are somehow
reduced to pawns for the other side (made of those who
subvert equity and efficiency and safeguards /
guarantees and are found equally in Govt, NGO,
professions, business, politics, wherever). the game
can not be according to rules till our pieces are
reclaimed. we cannot break the board and walk away, it
is our board. we cannot drag *them* on to our turf,
they are standing on our turf.
for DDA I prefer s.41(3) to RTI (we need intervention
to heal not information to kill). for sanjhaNGOs (also
ITPI, PHDCC, etc, which are structurally same), RTI
would be very nice, but I have the impression they are
above it. They are not?
--- sarbajit roy <sroy1947@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Gita,
>
> Thanks for a very detailed post.
>
> We are still in middle game (chesswise) and NOT
> trapped. When the game is not played by the Rules -
> break the board, walk away and drag them onto your
> turf.
>
> 1) Writing long letters etc. may not work - there is
> already enough documentation to show engagement.
> It's
> time for telegrams (obtain certified copies by
> paying
> Rs. 3 extra) to Prez (as Central Government), short
> 1
> page leters to LG, AKJain(as secy Enquiry Board),
> then
> its time for the Real Monty.
>
> 2) Another route is also open (you wont like this
> one), you can file RTIs "now" under the new law.
> This
> saves 10 days. Here are the details - it would be
> interesting to see if DDA is prepared for the RTI
> onslaught. Asian Age had it today.
>
>
http://www.asianage.com/main.asp?layout=2&cat1=7&cat2=48&newsid=184492&RF=DefaultMain
>
> Here's another link (BETTER) to it since Asian Age
> link stpos working after 24 hours due to poor
> webdesign technology.
>
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cyberlaw-india/message/2147
>
> I am facing the same problem about procedural
> bypassing in my fight against the Information
> Technology Act 2005 amendments.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> --- Gita Dewan Verma <mpisgplanner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > An illegal Board has started today illegal
> NGO-style
> > hearings at PHD House and VPSingh/Sajha-Munch, who
> > have made illegal demand for their nominee to be
> on
> > Board, plan to protest bureaucratic-style
> > functioning
> > outside DDA Vikas Sadan. we are trapped between
> two
> > illegal choices. we know we have been trapped.
> what
> > will we do now? *now*. the endgame has begun.
...
> > Do please browse the urls in this post.
http://mail.architexturez.net/+/MPISG-Media/archive/msg00575.shtml
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com