On 12.18 Keith Meatto wrote:
how is it that owning up to one's anxiety does not degenerate into what
Hubert Dreyfus calls a secularized version of Kierkegaard's Religiousness
A? not sure I agree with Dryfus' reading in the appendix to
Being-in-the-world, yet I have not been able to find sufficient textual
evidence in BT to offer
an explanation of my own. realize this is a fairly basic question but
would welcome any thoughts and recommendations. "
A comment on religion rather than on anxiety:
What about Heidegger's religion? I think that the question is worth pursuing.
It would not be religion in Kierkegaard sense, but taking into account that
Aletheia is a godess, Holderlin's influence, Nietzsche's influence, etc. etc.
one could indeed try to speak of Heidegger's religion. Religion which is, as
is also certain kind of ethics, all over Heidegger. Perhaps?
PEtar Ramadanovic, Binghamton university
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
how is it that owning up to one's anxiety does not degenerate into what
Hubert Dreyfus calls a secularized version of Kierkegaard's Religiousness
A? not sure I agree with Dryfus' reading in the appendix to
Being-in-the-world, yet I have not been able to find sufficient textual
evidence in BT to offer
an explanation of my own. realize this is a fairly basic question but
would welcome any thoughts and recommendations. "
A comment on religion rather than on anxiety:
What about Heidegger's religion? I think that the question is worth pursuing.
It would not be religion in Kierkegaard sense, but taking into account that
Aletheia is a godess, Holderlin's influence, Nietzsche's influence, etc. etc.
one could indeed try to speak of Heidegger's religion. Religion which is, as
is also certain kind of ethics, all over Heidegger. Perhaps?
PEtar Ramadanovic, Binghamton university
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---