>Correspondence interprets being as presence. Unconcealing sees being as
>"being moved"; but didn't Aristotle see this with energeia? "Being moved"
>is the energeia of a dunamis as a dunamis. Maybe Heidegger didn't
>properly appreciate Aristotle's fundamental insight, even if he could
>name it (i.e. being as energeia). Oh well, at least I agree with
>Heidegger that we should all be studying Aristotle for 10 or 15 years
>in order to approach the task of thinking!
Aristotle is the source of "Bewegtsein." Yes, it has a lot to do with energeia.
Chris
_______________________________________________________________________
All I got is a red guitar
Three chords
And the truth
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---