On Sun, 16 Jul 1995 PhilMill@xxxxxxx wrote:
> However, I do think it would be difficult to answer the
> question you're asking without first clarifying why it is
> that we're subject to the authentic/inauthentic
> disjunction in the first place. If that were clearer,
> some possible answers to your question might suggest
> themselves.
------------------------
Agreed. Any suggestions?
-David Schenk.
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
> However, I do think it would be difficult to answer the
> question you're asking without first clarifying why it is
> that we're subject to the authentic/inauthentic
> disjunction in the first place. If that were clearer,
> some possible answers to your question might suggest
> themselves.
------------------------
Agreed. Any suggestions?
-David Schenk.
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------