On Thu, 19 Sep 1996, M.Eldred_artefact wrote:
> Chris M.:
> "Why does aletheia as you understand it necessarily exclude a god?"
>
> The other way round: Why does it need it? Then everything gets hung up again on
> a supreme being. Back to square one.
Turn it around again: why does god mean supreme being? Why does
Heidegger think that aletheia is the way to appropriately open the
dimension of the divine in which gods can presence (and absence) themselves?
Chris (R.)
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
> Chris M.:
> "Why does aletheia as you understand it necessarily exclude a god?"
>
> The other way round: Why does it need it? Then everything gets hung up again on
> a supreme being. Back to square one.
Turn it around again: why does god mean supreme being? Why does
Heidegger think that aletheia is the way to appropriately open the
dimension of the divine in which gods can presence (and absence) themselves?
Chris (R.)
--- from list heidegger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---